Literature DB >> 19609536

Comparison of a colonic J-pouch and transverse coloplasty pouch in patients with rectal cancer after an ultralow anterior resection using fecoflowmetric profiles.

Yasuo Kobayashi1, Kobayashi Yasuo, Minoru Yagi, Yagi Minoru, Tsuneo Iiai, Iiai Tsuneo, Tatsuo Tani, Tani Tatsuo, Satoshi Maruyama, Maruyama Satoshi, Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama, Hatakeyama Katsuyoshi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because the standard straight coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer tends to result in unfavorable outcomes in terms of defecatory function, colonic pouch reconstruction has therefore recently been adopted in many institutions. The colonic J-pouch (CJP)- and transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP)-anal anastomoses have been adopted worldwide. However, the comparative benefits and drawbacks of the two procedures are uncertain. This study was designed to analyze the functional and clinical outcomes after an ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) using the fecoflowmetry (FFM).
METHODS: Between November 1996 and July 2005, 18 patients were studied retrospectively. They were evaluated by FFM, together with Kelly's clinical score (KCS), and anorectal manometric assessments were also performed.
RESULTS: The KCS directly correlated to the maximum fecal stream flow rate (Fmax). In this study, postoperative patients with good KCS as well as a high value of Fmax were seen more in the patients with CJP than in those with TCP.
CONCLUSION: From the viewpoint of FFM, the patients with CJP had a more favorable functional outcome than those with TCP. FFM provided quantitative and qualitative evaluations concerning the anorectal motor activity in patients who had undergone an ULAR for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609536     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0763-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Steven Brown; Siu-Meng Heah; Charles Tsang; Francis Seow-Choen; Kong-Weng Eu; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Evaluation of anorectal functions of children with anorectal malformations using fecoflowmetry.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kayaba; Tatsuzo Hebiguchi; Hiroaki Yoshino; Masaru Mizuno; Mamiko Yamada; Junichi Chihara; Tetsuo Kato
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  The clinical and radiological assessment of anal continence in childhood.

Authors:  J H Kelly
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1972-08

4.  Experimental study of neorectal physiology after formation of a transverse coloplasty pouch.

Authors:  C A Maurer; K Z'graggen; W Zimmermann; H J Häni; D Mettler; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices.

Authors:  P J McDonald; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A novel colon pouch and its comparison with a straight coloanal and colon J-pouch--anal anastomosis: preliminary results in pigs.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; C A Maurer; D Mettler; C Stoupis; S Wildi; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Fecoflowmetry in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A Shafik; A M Khalid
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.745

8.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R Parc; E Tiret; P Frileux; E Moszkowski; J Loygue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma?

Authors:  W G Lewis; I G Martin; M E Williamson; B M Stephenson; P J Holdsworth; P J Finan; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fecoflowmetric analysis of anorectal motor function in postoperative anal-preserving surgery patients with low rectal cancer comparison with the wexner score and anorectal manometry.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Ryu; Yoshito Akagi; Minoru Yagi; Teruo Sasatomi; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Keizo Yamaguchi; Yousuke Oka; Suguru Fukahori; Ichitaro Shiratsuchi; Takefumi Yoshida; Yukito Gotanda; Natsuki Tanaka; Takafumi Ohchi; Kansakar Romeo; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

2.  Comparison of Colonic J-pouch and Straight Coloanal anastomosis after Low Anterior Resection.

Authors:  Shaban Mehrvarz; Seyed Mohsen Towliat; Hassan Ali Mohebbi; Saieed Derakhshani; Mahdi Abavisani
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.