Literature DB >> 12131085

Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.

Yik-Hong Ho1, Steven Brown, Siu-Meng Heah, Charles Tsang, Francis Seow-Choen, Kong-Weng Eu, Choong Leong Tang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a novel coloplasty colonic pouch design in optimizing bowel function after ultralow anterior resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A colonic J-pouch may reduce excessive stool frequency and incontinence after anterior resection, but at the risk of evacuation problems. Experimental surgery on pigs has suggested that a coloplasty pouch (CP) may be a useful alternative. Although CP has recently been shown to be feasible in patients, there is no randomized controlled trial comparing bowel function with the J-pouch.
METHODS: After anterior resection for cancer, patients were allocated to either J-pouch or CP-anal anastomoses. Continence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments were made before surgery. All complications were recorded, and these preoperative assessments were repeated at 4 months. The assessments were repeated again at 1 year, and a quality of life questionnaire was added.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were recruited from October 1998 to April 2000. Both groups were well matched for age, gender, staging, adjuvant therapy, and mean follow-up. There were no differences in the intraoperative time and hospital stay. CP resulted in more anastomotic leaks. At 4 months, J-pouch patients had 10.3% less stool fragmentation but poorer stool deferment and more nocturnal leakage. However, there were no differences in the bowel function, continence score, and quality of life at 1 year. There were no differences in the anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Coloplasty pouches resulted in more anastomotic leaks and minimal differences in bowel function. At present, the J-pouch remains the benchmark for routine clinical practice, and due care (including defunctioning stoma) should be exercised in situations requiring CP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131085      PMCID: PMC1422548          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200207000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum.

Authors:  A Berger; E Tiret; R Parc; P Frileux; L Hannoun; B Nordlinger; R Ratelle; R Simon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis.

Authors:  C R Mantyh; T L Hull; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Anal pressures impaired by stapler insertion during colorectal anastomosis: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Y H Ho; M Tan; A Leong; K W Eu; D Nyam; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Experimental study of neorectal physiology after formation of a transverse coloplasty pouch.

Authors:  C A Maurer; K Z'graggen; W Zimmermann; H J Häni; D Mettler; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Colonic "coloplasty": novel technique to enhance low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis.

Authors:  V W Fazio; C R Mantyh; T L Hull
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Small colonic J-pouch improves colonic retention of liquids--randomized, controlled trial with scintigraphy.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Sidney Yu; Ee-Sin Ang; F Seow-Choen; Felix Sundram
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Y H Ho; F Seow-Choen; M Tan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Ambulatory manometry in patients with colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomoses: randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Y H Ho; M Tan; A F Leong; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Postanal sphincter repair for anterior resection anal sphincter injuries: report of three cases.

Authors:  Y H Ho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  41 in total

1.  [Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].

Authors:  S Willis; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Ileocecal reservoir reconstruction after total mesorectal excision: functional results of the long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C T Hamel; J Metzger; G Curti; L Degen; F Harder; M O von Flüe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Diverting stoma with anterior resection for rectal cancer: does it reduce overall anastomotic leakage and leaks requiring laparotomy?

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Ming Zhong; Lu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 4.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer: clinical implications of results from randomised trials.

Authors:  Sameer Gujral; Kerry N L Avery; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Massarat Zutshi; Feza H Remzi; Yann Parc; Reinhard Ruppert; Alois Fürst; James Celebrezze; Susan Galanduik; Guy Orangio; Neil Hyman; Leslie Bokey; Emmanuel Tiret; Boris Kirchdorfer; David Medich; Marcus Tietze; Tracy Hull; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  [The transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection: early postoperative results].

Authors:  A Ulrich; K Z'graggen; B Schmied; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Comparison of a colonic J-pouch and transverse coloplasty pouch in patients with rectal cancer after an ultralow anterior resection using fecoflowmetric profiles.

Authors:  Yasuo Kobayashi; Kobayashi Yasuo; Minoru Yagi; Yagi Minoru; Tsuneo Iiai; Iiai Tsuneo; Tatsuo Tani; Tani Tatsuo; Satoshi Maruyama; Maruyama Satoshi; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama; Hatakeyama Katsuyoshi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.