Literature DB >> 9881477

Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes.

J L Barbur1, J Wolf, P Lennie.   

Abstract

Visual latencies, and their variation with stimulus attributes, can provide information about the level in the visual system at which different attributes of the image are analysed, and decisions about them made. A change in the colour, structure or movement of a visual stimulus brings about a highly reproducible transient constriction of the pupil that probably depends on visual cortical mechanisms. We measured this transient response to changes in several attributes of visual stimuli, and also measured manual reaction times to the same stimulus changes. Through analysis of latencies, we hoped to establish whether changes in different stimulus attributes were processed by mechanisms at the same or different levels in the visual pathway. Pupil responses to a change in spatial structure or colour are almost identical, but both are ca. 40 ms slower than those to a change in light flux, which are thought to depend largely on subcortical pathways. Manual reaction times to a change in spatial structure or colour, or to the onset of coherent movement, differ reliably, and all are longer than the reaction time to a change in light flux. On average, observers take 184 ms to detect a change in light flux, 6 ms more to detect the onset of a grating, 30 ms more to detect a change in colour, and 37 ms more to detect the onset of coherent motion. The pattern of latency variation for pupil responses and reaction times suggests that the mechanisms that trigger the responses lie at different levels in cortex. Given our present knowledge of visual cortical organization, the long reaction time to the change in motion is surprising. The range of reaction times across different stimuli is consistent with decisions about the onset of a grating being made in V1 and decisions about the change in colour or change in motion being made in V4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9881477      PMCID: PMC1689528          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Pupillary responses to stimulus structure, colour and movement.

Authors:  J L Barbur; A J Harlow; A Sahraie
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Visual response latencies in striate cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; J R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pupil responses to stimulus color, structure and light flux increments in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P D Gamlin; H Zhang; A Harlow; J L Barbur
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Color dynamics of the pupil.

Authors:  M Kohn; M Clynes
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-04-21       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Insights into the different exploits of colour in the visual cortex.

Authors:  J L Barbur; A J Harlow; G T Plant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Spatial pattern as a stimulus to the pupillary system.

Authors:  K Ukai
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Visual acuity measured with pupil responses to checkerboard stimuli.

Authors:  J Slooter; D van Norren
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Pupil responses to foveal exchange of monochromatic lights.

Authors:  R S Young; M Alpern
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-06

9.  Using color substitution pupil response to expose chromatic mechanisms.

Authors:  V D Saini; G H Cohen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-07

10.  The neural substrate for the pupillary light reflex in the pigeon (Columba livia).

Authors:  P D Gamlin; A Reiner; J T Erichsen; H J Karten; D H Cohen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-07-10       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  20 in total

1.  A linear chromatic mechanism drives the pupillary response.

Authors:  S Tsujimura; J S Wolffsohn; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Masking within and across visual dimensions: psychophysical evidence for perceptual segregation of color and motion.

Authors:  Samuel W Cheadle; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Pupillary response induced by stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Fuchuan Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Properties of pupillary responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Peiji Liang; Fuchuan Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visually guided movements to color targets.

Authors:  Brian J White; Dirk Kerzel; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  A H Bell; M A Meredith; A J Van Opstal; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effects of bottom-up target luminance and top-down spatial target predictability on saccadic reaction times.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Douglas Perry Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Ron Levy; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.