Literature DB >> 19578839

The effects of bottom-up target luminance and top-down spatial target predictability on saccadic reaction times.

Robert A Marino1, Douglas Perry Munoz.   

Abstract

Saccadic reaction times (SRT) are composed of the sum of multiple processes, including bottom-up sensory processing, top-down goal oriented processing, and afferent and efferent conduction delays. In order to determine the timing dependencies and potential interactions between bottom-up and top-down processes on SRTs, we trained monkeys to perform several variants of visually guided saccade tasks. Bottom-up components of SRT were manipulated by varying target luminance from near detection threshold to supra-threshold ranges (i.e., 0.001-42.5 cd/m(2)). There was a significant reduction of mean SRT with increases in target luminance up to 3.5-17.5 cd/m(2). Luminance increases above these ranges produced significant increases in SRT when the target was within 6 degrees from the fovea. Top-down components were assessed by manipulating spatial target predictability across blocks of trials using either 1, 2, 4 or 8 possible target locations. Decreasing spatial target predictability increased SRT across target luminances from 1 to 4 targets in the gap task, but then paradoxically decreased SRT again when there were 8 possible targets in both the gap and step tasks. Finally, a gap task (200 ms gap) was used to determine the dependence of target luminance on the magnitude of the gap effect. Decreasing target luminance significantly reduced the magnitude of the gap effect indicating that the gap effect is strongly influenced by bottom-up factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19578839     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1919-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  59 in total

Review 1.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency; evidence for independence of detection and decision.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Discharge properties of monkey tectoreticular neurons.

Authors:  C Kip Rodgers; Douglas P Munoz; Stephen H Scott; Martin Paré
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of uncertainty and target displacement on the latency of express saccades in man.

Authors:  L A Dickov; J D Morrison
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability.

Authors:  M A Basso; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Express saccades in man and monkey.

Authors:  B Fischer
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Dependence of saccadic eye-movements on stimulus luminance, and an effect of task.

Authors:  H Doma; P E Hallett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Further observations on the occurrence of express-saccades in the monkey.

Authors:  R Boch; B Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  An anti-Hick's effect in monkey and human saccade reaction times.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Alex St John; Richard A Abrams; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manipulations of the relationship between response alternatives and exogenous saccade latencies.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Joseph S Weaver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Different target-discrimination times can be followed by the same saccade-initiation timing in different stimulus conditions during visual searches.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tanaka; Satoshi Nishida; Tadashi Ogawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Ron Levy; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The influence of motivational salience on saccade latencies.

Authors:  Marcus Rothkirch; Florian Ostendorf; Anne-Lene Sax; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Transient pupil response is modulated by contrast-based saliency.

Authors:  Chin-An Wang; Susan E Boehnke; Laurent Itti; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Commentary: Piéron's law is not just an artifact of the response mechanism.

Authors:  José M Medina; José A Díaz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Effects of a pretarget distractor on saccade reaction times across space and time in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Douglas P Munoz; Naomi Takahashi; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.