Literature DB >> 1408159

Pupillary responses to stimulus structure, colour and movement.

J L Barbur1, A J Harlow, A Sahraie.   

Abstract

Pupillary responses to stimuli which favour the preferential stimulation of neural mechanisms involved in the detection of visual attributes such as colour, spatial structure, movement and light flux changes on the retina have been measured and compared. Pupil responses to a decrement in stimulus luminance (i.e., a flash of darkness), suggest that at least three components are involved in this response, their relative contribution being determined largely by stimulus size, contrast and presentation time. A comparison of pupil responses to gratings of equal and lower space-averaged luminance shows that the amplitude of pupillary constriction at grating onset for the equal luminance condition is about twice that measured with similar gratings in the lower luminance condition. Pupillary responses to chromatic isoluminant gratings are in general of longer latency when compared to responses of similar amplitude elicited by achromatic gratings. Small pupillary constrictions elicited by the onset of coherent movement in dynamic, random dot patterns are also demonstrated under stimulus conditions which eliminate pupillary responses to sudden light flux changes on the retina. The results support an earlier hypothesis which suggests that the onset of sudden changes in neural activity in the visual cortex when a visual stimulus is presented to the eye causes an overall perturbation which weakens transiently the regulatory inhibitory input to the pupillomotor nucleus. This, in turn, results in a transient increase in the efferent parasympathetic innervation of the iris sphincter muscle and hence the observed constriction of the pupil. The characteristics of the pupillary response reflect the properties of the mechanisms and the number of neurones which participate in the detection of each stimulus attribute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1408159     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  39 in total

1.  The unseen color aftereffect of an unseen stimulus: insight from blindsight into mechanisms of color afterimages.

Authors:  J L Barbur; L Weiskrantz; J A Harlow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A linear chromatic mechanism drives the pupillary response.

Authors:  S Tsujimura; J S Wolffsohn; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dissociable saccadic suppression of pupillary and perceptual responses to light.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Pupillary response induced by stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Fuchuan Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Three-dimensional virtual images modify the waveform of pupillary near response.

Authors:  Taisuke Matsuda; Yasuo Suzuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes.

Authors:  J L Barbur; J Wolf; P Lennie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Pupil response triggered by the onset of coherent motion.

Authors:  A Sahraie; J L Barbur
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Ceri T Trevethan; Mary Joan MacLeod; Alison D Murray; John A Olson; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Can we do without mydriasis in multifocal ERG recordings?

Authors:  Charlotte M Poloschek; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Pupil response as a predictor of blindsight in hemianopia.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Ceri T Trevethan; Mary Joan MacLeod; James Urquhart; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.