Literature DB >> 9870020

The current status of single lead dual chamber sensing and pacing.

H F Tse1, C P Lau.   

Abstract

The use of single lead, atrial synchronous ventricular (VDD) pacing in patients with high grade atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus node function is an acceptable alternative to dual chamber (DDD) pacing. Implantation and follow up procedures are simplified, and cost is usually reduced by more than the cost of an additional atrial lead. With the use of either diagonally arranged dipole or closely spaced ring electrodes, reliable atrial sensing can be achieved using differential atrial amplifier and high atrial sensitivity. Also oversensing is infrequently observed using provocation tests and dynamic recordings, clinical undersensing is unusual and minimized by programming to the highest atrial sensitivity. However, as atrial pacing is not possible, loss of AV synchrony and rate response may occur for unrecognized or progressive sinus node disease and lower rate limit. The development of single lead dual chamber pacing system may overcome this limitation. Recent studies have demonstrated that atrial pacing can be effective either with the use of a special pacing lead configuration or via floating atrial electrode with a novel stimulation method. Overlapping Biphasic Impulse (OLBI) can reduce atrial pacing threshold. Early clinical experience suggested that this new pacing method can provide effective and reliable atrial pacing with a relatively low incidence of diaphragmatic pacing. Thus the problem of atrial sensing is solved with a single pass lead but further long term evaluation is required to assess the efficacy and feasibility of new instrumentation for single lead dual chamber pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9870020     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009737020626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  37 in total

1.  Experience and implantation techniques with a new single-pass lead VDD pacing system.

Authors:  E Longo; V Catrini
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Report of a working party of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-08

Review 3.  Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.

Authors:  A B Hesselson; V Parsonnet; A D Bernstein; G J Bonavita
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparative evaluation of acute and long-term clinical performance of two single lead atrial synchronous ventricular (VDD) pacemakers: diagonally arranged bipolar versus closely spaced bipolar ring electrodes.

Authors:  C P Lau; S K Leung; I S Lee
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  U.S. experience with the AddVent VDD(R) pacing system. AddVent Phase I Investigators.

Authors:  L Gessman; M White; N Ghaly; S Raman; D Damm; J Macfie; C Timko; E Fields
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Toward optimizing the detection of atrial depolarization with floating bipolar electrodes.

Authors:  R R Brownlee
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Comparative evaluation of bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude during everyday activities: atrial active fixation versus two types of single pass VDD/R leads.

Authors:  C C Chan; C P Lau; S K Leung; Y T Tai; W H Leung; I Lee; M O Tang
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Single-lead VDD pacing system.

Authors:  P Varriale; A G Pilla; M Tekriwal
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Initial clinical experience with a single pass VDDR pacing system.

Authors:  C P Lau; Y T Tai; J P Li; F L Chung; S Sung; A Yamamoto
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Quality-of-life in DDDR pacing: atrioventricular synchrony or rate adaptation?

Authors:  C P Lau; Y T Tai; P W Lee; B Cheung; M O Tang; W K Lam
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Basics of cardiac pacing: selection and mode choice.

Authors:  John M Morgan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The impact of the distance between the atrial electrode and the atrial wall on atrial undersensing in patients with VDD pacemakers: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Timucin Altin; Muharrem Guldal; Basar Candemir; Cegerhun Polat; Aydan O Ozdemir; Cansin Tulunay; Cagdas Ozdol; Omer Akyurek; Remzi Karaoguz; Cetin Erol
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Rapid custom prototyping of soft poroelastic biosensor for simultaneous epicardial recording and imaging.

Authors:  Bongjoong Kim; Arvin H Soepriatna; Woohyun Park; Haesoo Moon; Abigail Cox; Jianchao Zhao; Nevin S Gupta; Chi Hoon Park; Kyunghun Kim; Yale Jeon; Hanmin Jang; Dong Rip Kim; Hyowon Lee; Kwan-Soo Lee; Craig J Goergen; Chi Hwan Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.