Literature DB >> 1593051

Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.

A B Hesselson1, V Parsonnet, A D Bernstein, G J Bonavita.   

Abstract

Nine hundred fifty patients who received three modes of primary pacemaker systems (581 dual-chamber universal [DDD], 84 atrioventricular-sequential ventricular-inhibited [DVI] and 285 ventricular-inhibited [VVI]) over 12 years were studied retrospectively to determine the effect of pacing mode on patient longevity and the subsequent development of chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter. All patients were followed up continuously for 7 to 8 years. Patients were classified according to indication for permanent pacing (sick sinus syndrome or other indication), age at pacemaker implantation (less than or equal to 70 or greater than 70 years) and history of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Fourteen percent of patients developed atrial fibrillation at some time during the study period. Of those, 4% had a DDD pacemaker, 8% had a DVI pacemaker and 19% had a VVI pacemaker. At 7 years, atrial fibrillation was significantly more frequent in the VVI group than in the DDD and DVI groups. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, the incidence rate was even higher in the VVI group but approximately the same in the DDD and DVI groups. Patients in the VVI and DVI groups who had had previous atrial tachyarrhythmia had a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation at 7 years than did those in the DDD group. During the entire period there were 130 deaths in the study group, including 22% of patients with a DDD pacemaker, 38% of those with a DVI pacemaker and 50% of those with a VVI pacemaker. Patient survival at 7 years was lower in the VVI group than in the DDD or DVI groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593051     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90616-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  33 in total

Review 1.  Endocavitary treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S B Olsson; E I Hertervig; O Kongstad; C Meurling; S Yuan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Disorders of Sinus Function.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  1999-08

Review 3.  Electrophysiologic assessment in selecting patients for multisite atrial pacing.

Authors:  P Delfaut; S Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Sex differences in selection of pacemakers: retrospective observational study.

Authors:  R Schüppel; G Büchele; L Batz; W Koenig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

5.  Pacing mode and long-term survival in elderly patients with congestive heart failure: 1980-1985.

Authors:  P A Brady; W K Shen; S A Neubauer; S C Hammill; D O Hodge; D L Hayes
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Stroke and atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  E Alt; G Lehmann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complexe number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syndrome: a randomized prospective cross over study.

Authors:  R Ricci; M Santini; A Puglisi; P Azzolini; A Capucci; C Pignalberi; G Boriani; G L Botto; A Spampinato; F Bellocci; A Proclemer; A Grammatico; F de Seta
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  AV Interval Optimization - A Step Towards Physiological Pacing in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Shomu Bohora
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-09-05

10.  [Selection of the optimal pacemaker - Are age and secondary disease related health conditions significant?].

Authors:  G H von Knorre; W Voss; B Ismer; H Lüssow
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.