Literature DB >> 7845784

Comparative evaluation of bipolar atrial electrogram amplitude during everyday activities: atrial active fixation versus two types of single pass VDD/R leads.

C C Chan1, C P Lau, S K Leung, Y T Tai, W H Leung, I Lee, M O Tang.   

Abstract

Endocardial P wave amplitude (PWA) is an important determinant of the atrial sensing capabilities of an atrial-based pacing system. Although changes in PWA during physical activities are known to occur in DDD/R pacing, there is little information on the P wave stability in single pass lead VDD/R pacemakers using floating P wave sensing. We investigated the variation of PWA during daily life activities using telemetry recorded atrial electrograms in 21 patients with DDDR pacemakers (Relay or Elite) and 29 patients with single lead VDD/R pacemakers (Unity or Thera). Physical activities resulted in marked individual variability of PWA but, as a group, there was no significant difference between PWA during sitting, standing, lying down, and coughing in both DDDR and VDD/R pacing. In the Elite II pacemaker, walking at 2 miles per hour resulted in significant reduction of PWA (11.6% compared with sitting, P < 0.05). The most consistent reduction in PWA occurred in the relaxation phase of the Valsalva maneuver (VM), with all pacemakers showing a reduction in PWA (mean reduction in PWA compared with sitting in DDDR and VDD/R were 16.6% and 12.8%, respectively). Two patients with DDDR pacemakers (Relay) and three patients with VDD/R pacemakers (1 Unity and 2 Thera) had atrial sensing failure during VM or walking. In conclusion, large variation in PWA occurs during daily life activities. The extent of variation is dependent on the patients, types of atrial lead, and the maneuvers performed. A twice sensing threshold may be insufficient to ensure adequate atrial sensing during these activities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7845784     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03766.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  Atrial near-field and ventricular far-field analysis by automated signal processing at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Martin Lipphardt; Ulrich G Hofmann; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Ariel Roguin; Dorith Goldsher; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Brian S Caffo; Kevin D Frick; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  The current status of single lead dual chamber sensing and pacing.

Authors:  H F Tse; C P Lau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.900

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.