Literature DB >> 9860897

Approaches to developing alternative and predictive toxicology based on PBPK/PD and QSAR modeling.

R S Yang1, R S Thomas, D L Gustafson, J Campain, S A Benjamin, H J Verhaar, M M Mumtaz.   

Abstract

Systematic toxicity testing, using conventional toxicology methodologies, of single chemicals and chemical mixtures is highly impractical because of the immense numbers of chemicals and chemical mixtures involved and the limited scientific resources. Therefore, the development of unconventional, efficient, and predictive toxicology methods is imperative. Using carcinogenicity as an end point, we present approaches for developing predictive tools for toxicologic evaluation of chemicals and chemical mixtures relevant to environmental contamination. Central to the approaches presented is the integration of physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) and quantitative structure--activity relationship (QSAR) modeling with focused mechanistically based experimental toxicology. In this development, molecular and cellular biomarkers critical to the carcinogenesis process are evaluated quantitatively between different chemicals and/or chemical mixtures. Examples presented include the integration of PBPK/PD and QSAR modeling with a time-course medium-term liver foci assay, molecular biology and cell proliferation studies. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analyses of DNA changes, and cancer modeling to assess and attempt to predict the carcinogenicity of the series of 12 chlorobenzene isomers. Also presented is an ongoing effort to develop and apply a similar approach to chemical mixtures using in vitro cell culture (Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay and human keratinocytes) methodologies and in vivo studies. The promise and pitfalls of these developments are elaborated. When successfully applied, these approaches may greatly reduce animal usage, personnel, resources, and time required to evaluate the carcinogenicity of chemicals and chemical mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9860897      PMCID: PMC1533423          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s61385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  38 in total

1.  Neoplastic transformation of human epidermal keratinocytes by AD12-SV40 and Kirsten sarcoma viruses.

Authors:  J S Rhim; G Jay; P Arnstein; F M Price; K K Sanford; S A Aaronson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A common biochemical pattern in preneoplastic hepatocyte nodules generated in four different models in the rat.

Authors:  M W Roomi; R K Ho; D S Sarma; E Farber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  History of the Bioassay Program of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  E K Weisburger
Journal:  Prog Exp Tumor Res       Date:  1983

4.  Molecular connectivity: a novel method for prediction of bioconcentration factor of hazardous chemicals.

Authors:  A Sabljić; M Protić
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.192

5.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of a ternary mixture of alkyl benzenes in rats and humans.

Authors:  R Tardif; G Charest-Tardif; J Brodeur; K Krishnan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  A quantitative property-property relationship (QPPR) approach to estimate in vitro tissue-blood partition coefficients of organic chemicals in rats and humans.

Authors:  J DeJongh; H J Verhaar; J L Hermens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Relative merits of immunohistochemical demonstrations of placental, A, B and C forms of glutathione S-transferase and histochemical demonstration of gamma-glutamyl transferase as markers of altered foci during liver carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  M Tatematsu; Y Mera; N Ito; K Satoh; K Sato
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Enhanced regional expression of glutathione S-transferase P1-1 with colocalized AP-1 and CYP 1A2 induction in chlorobenzene-induced porphyria.

Authors:  R S Thomas; D L Gustafson; H S Ramsdell; H A el-Masri; S A Benjamin; R S Yang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously arising long-lived line of human keratinocytes (NM 1).

Authors:  H P Baden; J Kubilus; J C Kvedar; M L Steinberg; S R Wolman
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1987-03

10.  Modeling the chemistry of complex petroleum mixtures.

Authors:  R J Quann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effect thresholds and 'adequate control' of risks: The fatal flaws in the EU council's position on authorisation within REACH.

Authors:  David Santillo; Paul Johnston
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A docking-based receptor library of antibiotics and its novel application in predicting chronic mixture toxicity for environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zou; Xianghong Zhou; Zhifen Lin; Ziqing Deng; Daqiang Yin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Target and Tissue Selectivity Prediction by Integrated Mechanistic Pharmacokinetic-Target Binding and Quantitative Structure Activity Modeling.

Authors:  Anna H C Vlot; Wilhelmus E A de Witte; Meindert Danhof; Piet H van der Graaf; Gerard J P van Westen; Elizabeth C M de Lange
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun; Menghang Xia; Christopher P Austin; Ruili Huang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Computational Modeling of Mixture Toxicity.

Authors:  Mainak Chatterjee; Kunal Roy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Toxicity Assessment of the Binary Mixtures of Aquatic Organisms Based on Different Hypothetical Descriptors.

Authors:  Meng Ji; Lihong Zhang; Xuming Zhuang; Chunyuan Tian; Feng Luan; Maria Natália D S Cordeiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 7.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: integration of in silico approaches with micro cell culture analogues.

Authors:  A Chen; M L Yarmush; T Maguire
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Perils of paradigm: complexity, policy design, and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.

Authors:  Jason M Vogel
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Comparative Study on the EC50 Value in Single and Mixtures of Dimethylformamide, Methyl Ethyl Ketone, and Toluene.

Authors:  Ki-Woong Kim; Yong Lim Won; Dong Jin Park; Doh-Hee Kim; Kwan Young Song
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2014-09

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity: a chemical perspective.

Authors:  Richard M LoPachin; Terrence Gavin
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.