Literature DB >> 29204742

Target and Tissue Selectivity Prediction by Integrated Mechanistic Pharmacokinetic-Target Binding and Quantitative Structure Activity Modeling.

Anna H C Vlot1, Wilhelmus E A de Witte1, Meindert Danhof1, Piet H van der Graaf1,2, Gerard J P van Westen3, Elizabeth C M de Lange4.   

Abstract

Selectivity is an important attribute of effective and safe drugs, and prediction of in vivo target and tissue selectivity would likely improve drug development success rates. However, a lack of understanding of the underlying (pharmacological) mechanisms and availability of directly applicable predictive methods complicates the prediction of selectivity. We explore the value of combining physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to predict the influence of the target dissociation constant (K D) and the target dissociation rate constant on target and tissue selectivity. The K D values of CB1 ligands in the ChEMBL database are predicted by QSAR random forest (RF) modeling for the CB1 receptor and known off-targets (TRPV1, mGlu5, 5-HT1a). Of these CB1 ligands, rimonabant, CP-55940, and Δ8-tetrahydrocanabinol, one of the active ingredients of cannabis, were selected for simulations of target occupancy for CB1, TRPV1, mGlu5, and 5-HT1a in three brain regions, to illustrate the principles of the combined PBPK-QSAR modeling. Our combined PBPK and target binding modeling demonstrated that the optimal values of the K D and k off for target and tissue selectivity were dependent on target concentration and tissue distribution kinetics. Interestingly, if the target concentration is high and the perfusion of the target site is low, the optimal K D value is often not the lowest K D value, suggesting that optimization towards high drug-target affinity can decrease the benefit-risk ratio. The presented integrative structure-pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling provides an improved understanding of tissue and target selectivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kinetic selectivity; physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling; quantitative structure-activity relationship; target-mediated drug disposition; tissue selectivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29204742     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0172-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  67 in total

Review 1.  Cellular concentrations of enzymes and their substrates.

Authors:  K R Albe; M H Butler; B E Wright
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-03-22       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetics joined with in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of ADME: a marriage under the arch of systems pharmacology.

Authors:  A Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Mechanism-based PK/PD modeling of the respiratory depressant effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A Yassen; E Olofsen; R Romberg; E Sarton; L Teppema; M Danhof; A Dahan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  In vivo Target Residence Time and Kinetic Selectivity: The Association Rate Constant as Determinant.

Authors:  Wilhelmus E A de Witte; Meindert Danhof; Piet H van der Graaf; Elizabeth C M de Lange
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 14.819

5.  Neuropeptide Y receptor in the rat brain.

Authors:  A Undén; K Tatemoto; V Mutt; T Bartfai
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1984-12-17

6.  Modeling [18 F]MPPF positron emission tomography kinetics for the determination of 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) receptor concentration with multiinjection.

Authors:  Nicolas Costes; Isabelle Merlet; Luc Zimmer; Franck Lavenne; Luc Cinotti; Jacques Delforge; André Luxen; Jean-François Pujol; Didier Le Bars
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Species differences in mGluR5 binding sites in mammalian central nervous system determined using in vitro binding with [18F]F-PEB.

Authors:  Shil Patel; Terence G Hamill; Brett Connolly; Elaine Jagoda; Wenping Li; Raymond E Gibson
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Expression Atlas update--an integrated database of gene and protein expression in humans, animals and plants.

Authors:  Robert Petryszak; Maria Keays; Y Amy Tang; Nuno A Fonseca; Elisabet Barrera; Tony Burdett; Anja Füllgrabe; Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes; Simon Jupp; Satu Koskinen; Oliver Mannion; Laura Huerta; Karine Megy; Catherine Snow; Eleanor Williams; Mitra Barzine; Emma Hastings; Hendrik Weisser; James Wright; Pankaj Jaiswal; Wolfgang Huber; Jyoti Choudhary; Helen E Parkinson; Alvis Brazma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Unprecedently Large-Scale Kinase Inhibitor Set Enabling the Accurate Prediction of Compound-Kinase Activities: A Way toward Selective Promiscuity by Design?

Authors:  Serge Christmann-Franck; Gerard J P van Westen; George Papadatos; Fanny Beltran Escudie; Alexander Roberts; John P Overington; Daniel Domine
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  A systems pharmacology perspective on the clinical development of Fatty Acid amide hydrolase inhibitors for pain.

Authors:  N Benson; E Metelkin; O Demin; G L Li; D Nichols; P H van der Graaf
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  Electrochemical modulation enhances the selectivity of peripheral neurostimulation in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew T Flavin; Marek A Paul; Alexander S Lim; Charles A Lissandrello; Robert Ajemian; Samuel J Lin; Jongyoon Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Engineering Binders with Exceptional Selectivity.

Authors:  Kai Wen Teng; Akiko Koide; Shohei Koide
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Binding kinetics of ligands acting at GPCRs.

Authors:  David A Sykes; Leigh A Stoddart; Laura E Kilpatrick; Stephen J Hill
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  ChEMBL: towards direct deposition of bioassay data.

Authors:  David Mendez; Anna Gaulton; A Patrícia Bento; Jon Chambers; Marleen De Veij; Eloy Félix; María Paula Magariños; Juan F Mosquera; Prudence Mutowo; Michal Nowotka; María Gordillo-Marañón; Fiona Hunter; Laura Junco; Grace Mugumbate; Milagros Rodriguez-Lopez; Francis Atkinson; Nicolas Bosc; Chris J Radoux; Aldo Segura-Cabrera; Anne Hersey; Andrew R Leach
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Cell Surface Protein mRNAs Show Differential Transcription in Pyramidal and Fast-Spiking Cells as Revealed by Single-Cell Sequencing.

Authors:  Lilla Ravasz; Katalin Adrienna Kékesi; Dániel Mittli; Mihail Ivilinov Todorov; Zsolt Borhegyi; Mária Ercsey-Ravasz; Botond Tyukodi; Jinhui Wang; Tamás Bártfai; James Eberwine; Gábor Juhász
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.