Literature DB >> 9857604

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period.

H Eberhard1, U Hirschfelder.   

Abstract

The "Deckbiss" with skeletal Class II jaw relationship sometimes presents a considerable therapeutic problem, particularly in the late growth period (DP3U), as regards the coordination of dental and skeletal treatment objectives. An effective treatment approach was demonstrated: a modified Herbst appliance used simultaneously with fixed appliances in the maxilla. The sample comprised 12 male (14.0 +/- 0.9 years old) and 10 female (12.3 +/- 0.4 years old) patients. Correction of the distal occlusion was achieved in all patients by means of the Herbst appliance, which was removed after an average time period of 6.4 +/- 0.2 months. In the mandible the multibracket appliances were then immediately inserted, and Class II elastics were used for retention. Maximum anchorage was required in the maxilla as well as in the mandible. Complete diagnostic records were made at the beginning of the treatment as well as 6 and 12 months later, in order to document skeletal and dental changes. A dental and skeletal Class I relationship was achieved in all cases. A significant improvement was recorded in the vertical jaw base relationship; this was still stable after a period of 12 months. In the dental area in particular, a so-called high-pull headgear effect (intrusion and distalization 16, 26) and intrusion of teeth 34, 44 were registered. Only a minor protrusion of the mandibular incisors was observed. Reinforcement of the bands reduced the failure rate significantly. The Herbst appliance does not represent a standard treatment for Class II. Its indication range is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9857604     DOI: 10.1007/bf01299771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  19 in total

1.  The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation.

Authors:  H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.

Authors:  S Ruf; H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  H Pancherz; U Fackel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Long-term effects of Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.

Authors:  J Omblus; O Malmgren; H Pancherz; U Hägg; K Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation.

Authors:  H Pancherz; K Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use.

Authors:  H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-01

7.  The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.

Authors:  H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-08

8.  Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse?

Authors:  L Wieslander
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  K Hansen; H Pancherz
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.

Authors:  K Hansen
Journal:  Swed Dent J Suppl       Date:  1992
View more
  2 in total

1.  Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device.

Authors:  Julius Vu; Hans Pancherz; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.

Authors:  Niko Christian Bock; Christina Santo; Hans Pancherz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.