Literature DB >> 19194675

Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.

Niko Christian Bock1, Christina Santo, Hans Pancherz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the treatment and post-treatment effects of the Herbst-Multibracket (MB) appliance on facial profile and lip position in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral head films of 16 consecutively-treated adult Class II, Division 2 subjects (8 males, 8 females) with an average age of 18.8 years pre-treatment were analyzed on three occasions: before treatment (T1), after Herbst-MB treatment (T2) and 2 years post-treatment (T3).
RESULTS: Treatment period (T2-T1): an increase occurred in the hard tissue profile angle (2.5 degrees; p < 0.001), the soft tissue profile angle excluding the nose (2.6 degrees ; p < 0.01), and the soft tissue profile angle including the nose (1.8 degrees; p < 0.05). The upper lip became more retrusive in relation to the Esthetic line (EL) (0.8 mm; p < 0.05) while the lower lip's position was unchanged. Lower lip coverage of the upper incisors was reduced (0.8 mm; p < 0.05). Post-treatment period (T3-T2): the soft tissue profile angle (excluding the nose) increased (1.6 degrees; p < 0.01), while the hard and soft tissue profile angles including the nose remained unchanged. Both, the upper and lower lips became more retrusive in relation to the EL (0.9 mm; p < 0.01 and 1.0 mm; p < 0.001). The lower lip coverage of the upper incisors remained unchanged.
CONCLUSION: The hard and soft tissue profiles were straightened during Herbst-MB treatment, including a brief follow-up period. The lips became more retrusive while the lower lip coverage of the upper incisors was reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194675     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-009-8801-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  29 in total

1.  FEATURE OF THE UPPER CENTRAL INCISORS IN CLASS II, DIVISION 2.

Authors:  N R ROBERTSON; R HILTON
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation.

Authors:  H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Class II Division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws.

Authors:  S Peck; L Peck; M Kataja
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Incisor edge-centroid relationships and overbite depth.

Authors:  W J Houston
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation.

Authors:  H Pancherz; K Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The problem of overbite in Class II, division 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  J R Mills
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1973-08

7.  A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions.

Authors:  S K Binda; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; J K Maertens; M A van 't Hof
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.

Authors:  H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-08

9.  Variation in morphology of the maxillary central incisors found in class II, division 2 malocclusions.

Authors:  H P Delivanis; M M Kuftinec
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-10

10.  Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  K Hansen; H Pancherz
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  5 in total

1.  Soft tissue effects of three different Class II/1-camouflage treatment strategies.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Bengisu Akarsu-Guven; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Julia von Bremen; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  J von Bremen; C Erbe; H Pancherz; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device.

Authors:  Julius Vu; Hans Pancherz; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Correction of Deep Overbite by Using a Modified Nance Appliance in an Adult Class II Division 2 Patient with Dehiscence Defect.

Authors:  Zhujun Li; Zhengxi Chen; Jian Sun; Li'an Yang; Zhenqi Chen
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-09-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.