Literature DB >> 2351206

The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.

H Pancherz1, U Fackel.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to analyse cephalometrically the skeletofacial growth changes before and after dentofacial orthopaedics in 17 male subjects treated with the Herbst appliance. Herbst therapy was performed during an average time period of 7 months. The pre- and post-treatment periods in each subject were of equal lengths and amounted to an average of 31 months. No treatment was performed during the two control periods. When comparing the growth changes during Herbst treatment with those during the pretreatment control period it was found that: maxillary growth was inhibited and redirected; mandibular growth was increased; anterior mandibular growth rotation was arrested; sagittal intermaxillary jaw relationship improved; the skeletal profile straightened and the Go angle increased. During the post-treatment period several of the treatment changes reverted. The results of the study indicated that dentofacial orthopaedics using the Herbst appliance had only a temporary impact on the existing skeletofacial growth pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2351206     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/12.2.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period.

Authors:  H Eberhard; U Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Linda Frye; Ulrich Gross; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 fixed functional appliance on class II/1 patients at their postpubertal-peak growth period compared with the extraction method : A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Siamak Hemmatpour; Ali Mokhtar; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Predictors of Side Effects With Long-Term Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Hitomi Ono Minagi; Kentaro Okuno; Kanji Nohara; Takayoshi Sakai
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.

Authors:  Fabio de Abreu Vigorito; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

8.  Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Erhard Gnandt; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Dalia Latkauskiene; James A McNamara
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.