Literature DB >> 1516661

Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study.

K Hansen1, H Pancherz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of Herbst appliance treatment in relation to normal growth and development. The sample consisted of 32 subjects (16 boys and 16 girls) with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated successfully with the Herbst appliance for an average period of 7 months. The patients were reinvestigated 6 months post-treatment when the occlusion had settled and at the end of the growth period, an average of 6.7 years (SD = 1.1 years) after therapy. The control group comprised of 32 subjects (16 boys and 16 girls) with excellent occlusion (Bolton Standards). Sagittal, skeletal, and dental changes occurring during three observation periods were evaluated on lateral cephalograms in centric occlusion. On a long-term basis, Herbst treatment improved the sagittal jaw base relationship, but did not normalize it. The sagittal dental arch relationship, on the other hand, was almost normalized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1516661     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/14.4.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  [The dental and skeletal effects of the jumping-the-bite plate and high-pull headgear combination. A clinical study of treated patients].

Authors:  A Wichelhaus; F G Sander
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-07

2.  Treatment of Class II, Division 2 in the late growth period.

Authors:  H Eberhard; U Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  This study seems extremely problematic in terms of its methodology and the conclusions drawn.

Authors:  Henning Madsen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Facial profile and dental changes before, during and after treatment with Hansaplate/Headgear.

Authors:  C Hansson; B Sköld; S Linder-Aronson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.

Authors:  J Kochel; P Meyer-Marcotty; E Witt; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan LeCornu; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Chih-Da Wu; Brent Larson; Tung Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  [Skeletal and dental changes during the use of the bite-jumping plate. A cephalometric comparison with an untreated Class-II group].

Authors:  F G Sander; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-05

8.  Facial profile and lip position changes in adult Class II, Division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst-Multibracket appliance. A radiographic cephalometric pilot study.

Authors:  Niko Christian Bock; Christina Santo; Hans Pancherz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Chiara Pavoni; Kurt Faltin; James A McNamara; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Does daily wear time of Twin Block reliably predict its efficiency of class II treatment?

Authors:  Michal Sarul; Marek Nahajowski; Grzegorz Gawin; Joanna Antoszewska-Smith
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.341

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.