The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part I. Measurements.

The relative importance of the fat and muscle layers of the human abdominal wall in producing ultrasonic wavefront distortion was assessed by means of direct measurements. Specimens employed included six whole abdominal wall specimens and twelve partial specimens obtained by dividing each whole specimen into a fat and a muscle layer. In the measurement technique employed, a hemispheric transducer transmitted a 3.75-MHz ultrasonic pulse through a tissue section. The received wavefront was measured by a linear array translated in the elevation direction to synthesize a two-dimensional aperture. Insertion loss was also measured at various locations on each specimen. Differences in arrival time and energy level between the measured waveforms and computed references that account for geometric delay and spreading were calculated. After correction for the effects of geometry, the received waveforms were synthetically focused. The characteristics of the distortion produced by each specimen and the quality of the resulting focus were analyzed and compared. The measurements show that muscle produces greater arrival time distortion than fat while fat produces greater energy level distortion than muscle, but that the distortion produced by the entire abdominal wall is not equivalent to a simple combination of distortion effects produced by the layers. The results also indicate that both fat and muscle layers contribute significantly to the distortion of ultrasonic beams by the abdominal wall. However, the spatial characteristics of the distortion produced by fat and muscle layers differ substantially. Distortion produced by muscle layers, as well as focal images aberrated by muscle layers, show considerable anisotropy associated with muscle fiber orientation. Distortion produced by fat layers shows smaller-scale, granular structure associated with scattering from the septa surrounding individual fat lobules. Thick layers of fat may be expected to cause poor image quality due to both scattering and bulk absorption effects, while thick muscle layers may be expected to cause focus aberration due to large arrival time fluctuations. Correction of aberrated focuses using time-shift compensation shows more complete correction for muscle sections than for fat sections, so that correction methods based on phase screen models may be more appropriate for muscle layers than for fat layers.