Literature DB >> 9849840

Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland--result of difference in manual help to the baby's head.

J P Pirhonen1, S E Grenman, K Haadem, S Gudmundsson, P Lindqvist, S Siihola, R U Erkkola, K Marsal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal sphincter rupture is a serious complication of vaginal delivery and almost half the affected women have persistent defecatory symptoms despite adequate primary repair. During the past decade, the incidence of anal sphincter ruptures has been increasing in Sweden and is currently estimated to occur in 2.5% of vaginal deliveries. The aim of the study was to report the frequency of anal sphincter ruptures in two university hospitals in two Scandinavian countries, Malmö in Sweden and Turku in Finland, and analyze the potential determinants.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a population of 30,933 deliveries (26,541 vaginal) during the years 1990 to 1994.
RESULTS: The incidence of anal sphincter ruptures in Malmö, Sweden was 2.69%, and in Turku, Finland 0.36%. There were no significant population differences for the known risk factors (fetal weight, nulliparity or fetal head circumference). However, there is a difference in manual support given to the perineum and to the baby's head when crowning through the vaginal introitus between Malmö and Turku. The proportion of operative vaginal deliveries and abnormal presentations was significantly higher in Turku reflected in the lower Apgar score at 5 minutes and longer duration of second phase of labor. When high risk deliveries (operative vaginal delivery, abnormal presentation and newborns over 4,000 g) were excluded, the risk for anal sphincter ruptures was estimated to be 13 times higher in Malmö than in Turku.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference in the incidence of anal sphincter rupture between Malmö, Sweden and Turku, Finland may be due to the difference in manual control of the baby's head when crowning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9849840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  21 in total

1.  Risk factors associated with anal sphincter tear difference among midwife, private obstetrician, and resident deliveries.

Authors:  Eddie H M Sze; Maria Ciarleglio; Gerry Hobbs
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-03-13

2.  Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Robert Zemcik; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Hands on or hands off the perineum: a survey of care of the perineum in labour (HOOPS).

Authors:  Ruben Trochez; Malcolm Waterfield; Robert M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.

Authors:  Vigdis Aasheim; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Liv Merete Reinar; Mirjam Lukasse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

5.  Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Madhu Naidu; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection.

Authors:  Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Libor Lobovsky; Ludek Hyncik; Jaroslava Karbanova; Zdenek Rusavy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.

Authors:  Jeroen van Bavel; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Charlotte de Vries; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Joey de Vogel; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Ben Willem Mol; Jan Willem de Leeuw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Can ultrasound 10 days after obstetric anal sphincter injury predict anal incontinence at long-term follow-up?

Authors:  Malou Barbosa; Peter Christensen; Karl Møller-Bek; Lise Brogaard; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  A modified surgical approach to women with obstetric anal sphincter tears by separate suturing of external and internal anal sphincter. A modified approach to obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Pelle G Lindqvist; Mats Jernetz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Are women attending a midwifery-led birthing center at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  Bobby D O'Leary; Vineta Ciprike
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.