INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared hands-on manual perineal protection (MPP) and hands-off delivery techniques using the basic principles of mechanics and assessed the tension of perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. We also measured the effect of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominant-posterior hand on perineal tissue tension when a modified Viennese method of MPP is performed. METHODS: Hands-off and two variations of hands-on manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery were simulated using a biomechanical model, with the main outcome measure being strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Stress distribution with the hands-on model shows that when using MPP, the value of highest stress was decreased by 39 % (model B) and by 30 % (model C) compared with the hands-off model A. On the cross section there is a significant decrease in areas of equal tension throughout the perineal body in both hands-on models. Simulation of the modified Viennese MPP significantly reduces the maximum tension on the inner surface of the perineum measured at intervals of 2 mm from the posterior fourchette. CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with a finite element model of vaginal delivery, appropriate application of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominant-posterior hand to the surface of the perineum during the second stage of delivery significantly reduces tissue tension throughout the entire thickness of the perineum; thus, this intervention might help reduce obstetric perineal trauma.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared hands-on manual perineal protection (MPP) and hands-off delivery techniques using the basic principles of mechanics and assessed the tension of perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. We also measured the effect of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominant-posterior hand on perineal tissue tension when a modified Viennese method of MPP is performed. METHODS: Hands-off and two variations of hands-on manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery were simulated using a biomechanical model, with the main outcome measure being strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Stress distribution with the hands-on model shows that when using MPP, the value of highest stress was decreased by 39 % (model B) and by 30 % (model C) compared with the hands-off model A. On the cross section there is a significant decrease in areas of equal tension throughout the perineal body in both hands-on models. Simulation of the modified Viennese MPP significantly reduces the maximum tension on the inner surface of the perineum measured at intervals of 2 mm from the posterior fourchette. CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with a finite element model of vaginal delivery, appropriate application of the thumb and index finger of the accoucheur's dominant-posterior hand to the surface of the perineum during the second stage of delivery significantly reduces tissue tension throughout the entire thickness of the perineum; thus, this intervention might help reduce obstetric perineal trauma.
Authors: Elisabeth Hals; Pål Øian; Tiina Pirhonen; Mika Gissler; Sissel Hjelle; Elisabeth Berge Nilsen; Anne Mette Severinsen; Cathrine Solsletten; Tom Hartgill; Jouko Pirhonen Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Megan O Schimpf; Heidi S Harvie; Tola B Omotosho; Lee B Epstein; Marjorie Jean-Michel; Cedric K Olivera; Kristin E Rooney; Sunil Balgobin; Okechukwu A Ibeanu; Rajiv B Gala; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Hana Cechova; Vladimir Kalis; Linda Havelkova; Zdenek Rusavy; Pavel Fiala; Martina Rybarova; Ludek Hyncik; Ladislav Krofta; Khaled M Ismail Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jeroen van Bavel; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Charlotte de Vries; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Joey de Vogel; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Ben Willem Mol; Jan Willem de Leeuw Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Sari Räisänen; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Linda Havelková; Ladislav Krofta; Petra Kochová; Václav Liška; Vladimír Kališ; Jaroslav Feyereisl Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Iva Urbankova; Klara Grohregin; Jiri Hanacek; Michal Krcmar; Jaroslav Feyereisl; Jan Deprest; Ladislav Krofta Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-07-20 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Linda Havelkova; Tomas Zitka; David Tolar; Khaled M Ismail Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.007