Literature DB >> 24842121

The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection.

Magdalena Jansova1, Vladimir Kalis, Libor Lobovsky, Ludek Hyncik, Jaroslava Karbanova, Zdenek Rusavy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur's posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP.
METHODS: We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position.
RESULTS: The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the "hands-off" technique. Extent of reduction depended on the extent of finger movement across a horizontal, transverse x-axis, and on final finger position on a vertical, antero-posterior y-axis. The most effective modification of VMPP was initial position of fingers 12 cm apart (x = ±6) on the x-axis, 2 cm anteriorly from the posterior fourchette (y = +2) on the y-axis with 1cm movement of both finger and thumb toward the midline on the x-axis (Δx = 1) with no movement on the y-axis (Δy = 0).
CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with simulation of vaginal delivery, exact placement of fingertips on the perineal skin, together with their co-ordinated movement, plays an important role in the extent of reduction of perineal tension.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842121     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2425-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  25 in total

1.  A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hals; Pål Øian; Tiina Pirhonen; Mika Gissler; Sissel Hjelle; Elisabeth Berge Nilsen; Anne Mette Severinsen; Cathrine Solsletten; Tom Hartgill; Jouko Pirhonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Measuring the levator hiatus with axial MRI sequences: adjusting the angle of acquisition.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Rahel Nardos; Teresa Worstell; Amy Thurmond
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Subject specific finite element modelling of the levator ani.

Authors:  Su-Lin Lee; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Evidence-based labor and delivery management.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Jason K Baxter; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Anal dilation during labor.

Authors:  Vladimir Kalis; Jaroslava Karbanova; Zuzana Bukacova; Barbora Bednarova; Zdenek Rokyta; Milena Kralickova
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Stereophotogrammetry of the perineum during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Robert Zemčík; Jaroslava Karbanova; Vladimir Kalis; Libor Lobovský; Magdalena Jansová; Zdenek Rusavy
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Three-dimensional anal endosonography in depicting anal-canal anatomy.

Authors:  A Reginelli; Y Mandato; C Cavaliere; N L Pizza; A Russo; S Cappabianca; L Brunese; A Rotondo; R Grassi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Does vaginal size impact sexual activity and function?

Authors:  Megan O Schimpf; Heidi S Harvie; Tola B Omotosho; Lee B Epstein; Marjorie Jean-Michel; Cedric K Olivera; Kristin E Rooney; Sunil Balgobin; Okechukwu A Ibeanu; Rajiv B Gala; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery.

Authors:  Katariina Laine; Tiina Pirhonen; Rune Rolland; Jouko Pirhonen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Effects of age and gender on three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography measurements: development of normal ranges.

Authors:  A M Knowles; C H Knowles; S M Scott; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  5 in total

1.  Finite element modeling of maximum stress in pelvic floor structures during the head expulsion (FINESSE) study.

Authors:  Hana Cechova; Vladimir Kalis; Linda Havelkova; Zdenek Rusavy; Pavel Fiala; Martina Rybarova; Ludek Hyncik; Ladislav Krofta; Khaled M Ismail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Madhu Naidu; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Feasibility and safety of antepartum tactile imaging.

Authors:  Zdenek Rusavy; Vladimir Kalis; Salavat Aglyamov; Vladimir Egorov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Fetal head size and effect of manual perineal protection.

Authors:  Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Sari Räisänen; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Metrics of perineal support (MOPS) study.

Authors:  Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Linda Havelkova; Tomas Zitka; David Tolar; Khaled M Ismail
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.