INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur's posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP. METHODS: We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the "hands-off" technique. Extent of reduction depended on the extent of finger movement across a horizontal, transverse x-axis, and on final finger position on a vertical, antero-posterior y-axis. The most effective modification of VMPP was initial position of fingers 12 cm apart (x = ±6) on the x-axis, 2 cm anteriorly from the posterior fourchette (y = +2) on the y-axis with 1cm movement of both finger and thumb toward the midline on the x-axis (Δx = 1) with no movement on the y-axis (Δy = 0). CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with simulation of vaginal delivery, exact placement of fingertips on the perineal skin, together with their co-ordinated movement, plays an important role in the extent of reduction of perineal tension.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Comparison of the modifications of the Viennese method of manual perineal protection (VMPP) and hands-off delivery techniques by applying basic principles of mechanics with assessments of tensions within perineal structures using a novel biomechanical model of the perineum. Evaluation of the role of the precise placements of the accoucheur's posterior (dominant) thumb and index finger in perineal tissue tension when performing a modified Viennese method of MPP. METHODS: We carried out an experimental study on a biomechanical model of the perineum at NTIS (New Technologies for Information Society, Pilsen, Czech Republic). Hands-off and 38 variations of VMPP were simulated during vaginal delivery with the finite element model imitating a clinical lithotomy position. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were quantity and extent of strain/tension throughout the perineal body during vaginal delivery. Stress distribution between modifications of VMPP showed a wide variation in peak perineal tension from 72 to 102 % compared with 100 % for the "hands-off" technique. Extent of reduction depended on the extent of finger movement across a horizontal, transverse x-axis, and on final finger position on a vertical, antero-posterior y-axis. The most effective modification of VMPP was initial position of fingers 12 cm apart (x = ±6) on the x-axis, 2 cm anteriorly from the posterior fourchette (y = +2) on the y-axis with 1cm movement of both finger and thumb toward the midline on the x-axis (Δx = 1) with no movement on the y-axis (Δy = 0). CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical assessment with simulation of vaginal delivery, exact placement of fingertips on the perineal skin, together with their co-ordinated movement, plays an important role in the extent of reduction of perineal tension.
Authors: Elisabeth Hals; Pål Øian; Tiina Pirhonen; Mika Gissler; Sissel Hjelle; Elisabeth Berge Nilsen; Anne Mette Severinsen; Cathrine Solsletten; Tom Hartgill; Jouko Pirhonen Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: A Reginelli; Y Mandato; C Cavaliere; N L Pizza; A Russo; S Cappabianca; L Brunese; A Rotondo; R Grassi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2012-01-07 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Megan O Schimpf; Heidi S Harvie; Tola B Omotosho; Lee B Epstein; Marjorie Jean-Michel; Cedric K Olivera; Kristin E Rooney; Sunil Balgobin; Okechukwu A Ibeanu; Rajiv B Gala; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Hana Cechova; Vladimir Kalis; Linda Havelkova; Zdenek Rusavy; Pavel Fiala; Martina Rybarova; Ludek Hyncik; Ladislav Krofta; Khaled M Ismail Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Sari Räisänen; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Linda Havelkova; Tomas Zitka; David Tolar; Khaled M Ismail Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.007