Literature DB >> 31901952

Are women attending a midwifery-led birthing center at increased risk of anal sphincter injury?

Bobby D O'Leary1, Vineta Ciprike2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In recent years there has been renewed interest in midwifery-led care for women, with studies reporting similar neonatal outcomes despite lower rates of intervention in midwifery-led birthing centers. Research into obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) in these birthing centers is scarce. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of OASI after spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women in consultant or midwifery-led units over a ten-year period.
METHODS: All spontaneous vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women from 2008 to 2017 were analyzed in a single-center retrospective study. Women who had neuraxial analgesia were excluded. The primary endpoint was OASI. Labor characteristics in both groups were compared, and a multiple regression model was created.
RESULTS: During the study period, there were 3260 spontaneous vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women; 75.7% (2467/3260) delivered in the consultant-led unit and 24.3% (793/3260) in the midwifery-led unit (MLU). Women delivering in the MLU had a greater risk of anal sphincter injury than those delivering in the CLU (4.9% [39/793] vs 2.5% [62/2467], OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.32 - 3.01). Significant risk factors that increased the risk of OASI on regression analysis were birthweight and delivery in the midwifery-led unit.
CONCLUSIONS: Women delivering in the midwifery-led unit appear to be at double the risk of OASI when compared to those delivering in the consultant-led unit. These results are in contrast to previous studies in midwifery-led centers. This difference may be site-specific and further research is required before these results form part of patient counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Midwifery-led care; OASI; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; perineal trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31901952     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04218-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  30 in total

1.  Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.

Authors:  Melanie R L Meister; Alison G Cahill; Shayna N Conner; Candice L Woolfolk; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Clinical outcomes of the first midwife-led normal birth unit in China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ngai Fen Cheung; Rosemary Mander; Xiaoli Wang; Wei Fu; Hong Zhou; Liping Zhang
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.372

3.  Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland--result of difference in manual help to the baby's head.

Authors:  J P Pirhonen; S E Grenman; K Haadem; S Gudmundsson; P Lindqvist; S Siihola; R U Erkkola; K Marsal
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  A comparison of the outcomes of partnership caseload midwifery and standard hospital care in low risk mothers.

Authors:  Maree Johnson; Helen Stewart; Rachel Langdon; Pauline Kelly; Lian Yong
Journal:  Aust J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 0.647

5.  Fetal head circumference and length of second stage of labor are risk factors for levator ani muscle injury, diagnosed by 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women.

Authors:  Dan V Valsky; Michal Lipschuetz; Angelika Bord; Ido Eldar; Baruch Messing; Drorith Hochner-Celnikier; Yuval Lavy; Sarah M Cohen; Simcha Yagel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Fear causes tears - perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study.

Authors:  Helena E Lindgren; Åsa Brink; Marie Klinberg-Allvin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Perineal management techniques among midwives at five hospitals in New South Wales - a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Amanda J Ampt; Michelle de Vroome; Jane B Ford
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.100

8.  Midwife-led maternity care in Ireland - a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Dencker; Valerie Smith; Colette McCann; Cecily Begley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study.

Authors:  Katariina Laine; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Leiv Sandvik; Anne Cathrine Staff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Mary-Ann Davey; Mary Anne Biro; Tanya Farrell; Lisa Gold; Maggie Flood; Touran Shafiei; Ulla Waldenström
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.