Literature DB >> 9835834

Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.

E P Holmgren1, R J Seckinger, L M Kilgren, F Mante.   

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) has been proven to be a precise and applicable method for evaluating dental implant systems. By means of FEA, a parasaggital model was digitized from a computed tomography (CT)-generated patient data set, and various single-tooth, osseointegrated, two-dimensional dental implant models were simulated. The specific aims of the study were to: (1) examine the effect of implant diameter variation (3.8 mm-6.5 mm) of both a press-fit, stepped cylindrical implant type and a press-fit, straight cylindrical implant type as osseointegrated in the posterior mandible; (2) compare the stress-dissipating characteristics of the stepped implant versus the straight implant design; and (3) analyze the significance of bite force direction (vertical, horizontal, and oblique 45 degrees) on both implant types. The results of the FEA suggested that (1) using the widest diameter implant is not necessarily the best choice when considering stress distribution to surrounding bone, but within certain morphological limits, for both implant types, an optimum dental implant exists for decreasing the stress magnitudes at the bone-implant interface; (2) stress is more evenly dissipated throughout the stepped cylindrical implant when compared to the straight implant type; and (3) it is important in FEA of dental implants to consider not only axial forces (vertical loading) and horizontal forces (moment-causing loads), but also to consider a combined load (oblique bite force), since these are more realistic bite directions and for a given force will cause the highest localized stress in cortical bone. The theoretical analysis performed implies that clinically, whenever possible, an optimum, not necessarily larger, dental implant should be used based on the specific morphological limitations of the mandible and that a stepped cylindrical design for press-fit situations is most desirable from the standpoint of stress distribution to surrounding bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9835834     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  27 in total

1.  Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study.

Authors:  Samroeng Inglam; Siriwan Suebnukarn; Wichit Tharanon; Tratat Apatananon; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Use of finite element analysis in presurgical planning: treatment of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  E P Kavanagh; C Frawley; G Kearns; F Wallis; T McGloughlin; J Jarvis
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  S Vidya Bhat; Priyanka Premkumar; K Kamalakanth Shenoy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-09-10

4.  Stress and strain distribution in three different mini dental implant designs using in implant retained overdenture: a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  W Aunmeungtong; P Khongkhunthian; P Rungsiyakull
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-16

5.  Functional apparent moduli as predictors of oral implant osseointegration dynamics.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Yang-Jo Seol; Noboru Kikuchi; Steven A Goldstein; William V Giannobile
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  A pilot study of mini implants as a treatment option for prosthetic rehabilitation of ridges with sub-optimal bone volume.

Authors:  Anitha Balaji; Jumshad B Mohamed; R Kathiresan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-02-25

7.  Effects of washer on the stress distribution of mini-implant.

Authors:  Hyoung-Jun Jang; Soon-Yong Kwon; Seong-Hun Kim; Young-Guk Park; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Effect of hybrid layer and thickness on stress distribution of cervical wedge-shaped restorations.

Authors:  Evrim Eliguzeloglu; Oguz Eraslan; Huma Omurlu; Gurcan Eskitascıoglu; Sema Belli
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-04

9.  Stress distribution of various designs of prostheses on short implants or standard implants in posterior maxilla: a three dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Jomjunyong; P Rungsiyakull; C Rungsiyakull; W Aunmeungtong; M Chantaramungkorn; P Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

10.  Effects of cortical bone thickness at different healing times on microscrew stability.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Lixing Zhao; Zhenrui Xu; Tian Tang; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.