Literature DB >> 22190820

A pilot study of mini implants as a treatment option for prosthetic rehabilitation of ridges with sub-optimal bone volume.

Anitha Balaji1, Jumshad B Mohamed, R Kathiresan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Implants are the latest development in the field of prothodontics, but still not widely used because of its expensive and its lengthier duration. Patients with ideal bone quantity and quality accommodate the conventional implants. The selection of the width of the implants has been widely speculated and the manufacturers have recently launched a series of 'mini' implants of narrower diameter. The long-term success rate of these narrow diameter implants, needs to be assessed. STUDY: This 2 year retrospective study summarizes the recorded observations from 11 patients who received 2.4 mm diameter implants for single tooth restorations.
RESULTS: One implant failed 10 months after loading. The success rate was 90.9%. The clinical evaluation of the peri implant mucosa using periodontal indices gave satisfying results for the implant-mucosa interfaces.
CONCLUSION: The success rate of the mini implants of 90.9%, is encouraging and hence studies involving larger number patients can be undertaken to study the efficacy of this novel treatment plan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implants; Mini implants; Ridge deficiency

Year:  2011        PMID: 22190820      PMCID: PMC3177481          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-010-0152-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  17 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study.

Authors:  P Vigolo; A Givani
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Should the implant fit the patient or should the patient fit the implant?

Authors:  Dennis Flanagan
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  The mini dental implant in fixed and removable prosthetics: a review.

Authors:  Dennis Flanagan; Andrea Mascolo
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Measuring mobility of 2 dental implant fixtures of different configurations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  H Zeynep Ertugrul; Donald J Pipko
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.454

5.  Measurement of the fatigue life of mini dental implants: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dennis Flanagan; Horea Ilies; Paul McCullough; Scott McQuoid
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Immediate placement of multiple mini dental implants into fresh extraction sites: a case report.

Authors:  Dennis Flanagan
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Immediate loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible.

Authors:  Mi-Ra Ahn; Kyung-Mi An; Jung-Hwan Choi; Dong-Seok Sohn
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.454

8.  Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient.

Authors:  Trevor McClain Griffitts; Chad Patrick Collins; Patrick Charles Collins
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-11

9.  Implant diameter and bone density: effect on initial stability and pull-out resistance.

Authors:  H Kido; E E Schulz; A Kumar; J Lozada; S Saha
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  C J Ivanoff; L Sennerby; C Johansson; B Rangert; U Lekholm
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of patient satisfaction with mini-implant versus standard diameter implant overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Kannan Sridharan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Carlos Pérez-Albacete; Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; José E de Val Maté-Sánchez; Rafael A Delgado-Ruiz; Marcus Abboud; Eugenio Velasco; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.