Literature DB >> 9830178

Attitudes to the use of health outcome questionnaires in the routine care of patients with diabetes: a survey of general practitioners and practice nurses.

K A Meadows1, D Rogers, T Greene.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing availability of multidimensional health status and outcome measures of the patient's physical and emotional functioning, and a number of national initiatives to promote their use, little is known about the attitudes and behaviour of general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) regarding their use in evaluating the effectiveness of health care. What evidence there is remains largely anecdotal but supports the view that health outcome data is currently not used in the routine management of the patient. AIM: To investigate the attitudes and behaviour of GPs and PNs regarding the use of health outcome data in the routine care of patients with diabetes.
METHOD: A questionnaire comprising 20 attitudinal and behavioural statements covering the use and benefits of health outcome data in the routine care of patients with diabetes were sent to 156 GPs and 114 PNs in the Doncaster area together with a covering letter and two examples of multidimensional health outcome measures.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 90 (58%) GPs and 49 (50% corrected for out of scope) nurses. Median response scores showed that both GPs and nurses expressed a positive overall attitude towards health outcome measurement giving responses favourable to it in 15 (75%) and 18 (90%) of the statements respectively. A key finding was that 48% and 46% of GPs and PNs were unclear as to how they would use health outcome data.
CONCLUSION: While our findings reflect a favourable view towards the use of health outcome data for the routine management of the patient with diabetes in a general practice setting, a number of important barriers to their implementation have been identified. These include insufficient knowledge on their use, the need for easily interpretable data, and a lack of resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9830178      PMCID: PMC1313216     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Quality improvement: an international commodity?

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

2.  Forces motivating the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings and related clinical research.

Authors:  S O Thier
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The measurement of needs and outcomes: aids to enhancing shared understanding between doctors and patients?

Authors:  D Wilkin
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl       Date:  1993

5.  The clinical effectiveness of multidimensional geriatric assessment.

Authors:  L Rubenstein
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Detection of depressive disorder for patients receiving prepaid or fee-for-service care. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  K B Wells; R D Hays; M A Burnam; W Rogers; S Greenfield; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care--an application to asthma and diabetes.

Authors:  E McColl; I N Steen; K A Meadows; A Hutchinson; M P Eccles; J Hewison; P Fowler; S M Blades
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Functional health status levels of primary care patients.

Authors:  E Nelson; B Conger; R Douglass; D Gephart; J Kirk; R Page; A Clark; K Johnson; K Stone; J Wasson; M Zubkoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-06-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Major developments in behavioral diabetes research.

Authors:  D J Cox; L Gonder-Frederick
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-08

10.  The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  R W Evans; D L Manninen; L P Garrison; L G Hart; C R Blagg; R A Gutman; A R Hull; E G Lowrie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument.

Authors:  Jennifer L Close-Goedjen; Stephen M Saunders
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 2.  A systematic review: how to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in routine general practice?

Authors:  Tian-Hui Chen; Lu Li; Michael M Kochen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.

Authors:  Kirstie L Haywood; Andrew M Garratt; Sandra Carrivick; Joanne Mangnall; Suzanne M Skevington
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  [Patient reported outcomes. Relevance and application in ophthalmology].

Authors:  R P Finger; H P N Scholl; F G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Assessing the quality of life of adults with chronic respiratory diseases in routine primary care: construction and first validation of the 10-Item Respiratory Illness Questionnaire-monitoring 10 (RIQ-MON10).

Authors:  J E Jacobs; A R Maillé; R P Akkermans; C van Weel; R P T M Grol
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A survey of French general practitioners and a qualitative study on their use and assessment of predictive clinical scores.

Authors:  Marianne Sarazin; Solange Gonzalez Chiappe; Marie Kasprzyk; Patrick Mismetti; Andréa Lasserre
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-06-25

8.  A comparative survey of Nigerian physiotherapists' familiarity with, knowledge of and utilisation of standard outcome measures: 10 years after initial survey.

Authors:  Adesola C Odole; Olufemi O Oyewole; Aderonke O Akinpelu
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2018-06-28

9.  Patient-reported outcome measurements in clinical routine of trauma, spine and craniomaxillofacial surgeons: between expectations and reality: a survey among 1212 surgeons.

Authors:  Alexander Joeris; Christian Knoll; Vasiliki Kalampoki; Andrea Blumenthal; George Gaskell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.