Literature DB >> 19267220

Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.

Kirstie L Haywood1, Andrew M Garratt, Sandra Carrivick, Joanne Mangnall, Suzanne M Skevington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To survey continence specialists (CSs) about their assessment practice including their use of quality of life (QoL) information, perceived barriers, benefits and training needs.
METHODS: Cross-sectional national postal survey of 624 practicing CSs in the UK. The questionnaire included open and closed questions relating to assessment practice.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 299 (49%) CSs. Although 80% routinely assessed QoL, fewer than 54% demonstrated awareness of published questionnaires. The majority used structured questions (41%) many of which were non-standardised single items (26%) or locally developed questionnaires (19%). Only 22% used standardised patient-completed questionnaires such as the King's Health Questionnaire and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire. Perceived assessment barriers included the availability of appropriate questionnaires, patient disability, limited guidance, resources and time. Of those routinely assessing QoL, 77% wanted more support; the most useful media cited being the internet, followed by professional guidance and training courses.
CONCLUSION: Although QoL measurement is highly valued, there was wide variation in assessment practice with few adopting standardised approaches. Most CSs require greater guidance and support that takes account of their diverse needs. Familiar assessment barriers exist which the use of web-based information, in association with professional guidance might help overcome. Clear mechanisms are required to direct standardised and appropriate assessment practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19267220     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9459-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  35 in total

1.  Will evidence-based nursing practice make practice perfect? 1998.

Authors:  C A Estabrooks
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.

Authors:  Susan Marshall; Kirstie Haywood; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  S Jackson; J Donovan; S Brookes; S Eckford; L Swithinbank; P Abrams
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-06

Review 7.  The perspective of the patient.

Authors:  Nancy J Norton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  What outcomes matter to patients: a physician-researcher point of view.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application.

Authors:  James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Mariella M Lane
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  5 in total

1.  Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide.

Authors:  Eric K H Chan; Todd C Edwards; Kirstie Haywood; Sean P Mikles; Louise Newton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Can practitioners use patient reported measures to enhance person centred coordinated care in practice? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Hannah Wheat; Jane Horrell; Jose M Valderas; James Close; Ben Fosh; Helen Lloyd
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Factors in Randomized Controlled Trials Reported to Impact the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Into Routine Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natasha Anne Roberts; Kimberly Alexander; David Wyld; Monika Janda
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-11-26

4.  Using PROMs during routine medical consultations: The perspectives of people with Parkinson's disease and their health professionals.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Marjolein E A Verbiest; Suzanne I Vonk; Henk W Berendse; Bastiaan R Bloem; Martine C de Bruijne; Marjan J Faber
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care.

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh; Ray Pawson; Judy Wright; Nick Black; Jose Maria Valderas; David Meads; Elizabeth Gibbons; Laurence Wood; Charlotte Wood; Chris Mills; Sonia Dalkin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.