Literature DB >> 11840909

The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument.

Jennifer L Close-Goedjen1, Stephen M Saunders.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of technical support on mental health clinicians' attitudes and use of an outcome assessment (OA) instrument. Technical support involved providing clinicians with the scored and profiled results of an OA instrument administered to their patients. It was predicted that temporary exposure to the instrument's uses would improve clinicians' attitudes toward the instrument and that improved attitudes would lead to greater use. The results indicated that subsequent to support clinicians' attitudes toward the instrument were generally more positive, as they had generally more favorable opinions, saw it as more relevant, and reported that it was relatively easy to use. Contrary to expectations, however, clinicians did not use the OA instrument more frequently or regularly after support. The implications for clinics seeking to implement OA protocols are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840909     DOI: 10.1007/bf02287837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  17 in total

1.  The era of accountability in behavioral health care.

Authors:  G Theis; S Saunders
Journal:  Manag Care Interface       Date:  1999-07

2.  Outcomes measurement: compliance tool or strategic initiative?

Authors:  J C Linder
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1991

3.  Bringing staff on board: creating an outcomes project tied to continuous quality improvement in an adult community residential service.

Authors:  E Kersten; K Wilkinson; S Wright
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1999-05

4.  Outcomes research and practice guidelines. Upstream issues for downstream users.

Authors:  F Gifford
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 5.  Quality of care and cost-containment in managed mental health: policy, education, research, advocacy.

Authors:  R H Dana; M G Conner; J Allen
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1996-12

Review 6.  Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Cost containment and changing physicians' practice behavior. Can the fox learn to guard the chicken coop?

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; S V Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Health-related quality of life in primary care patients with mental disorders. Results from the PRIME-MD 1000 Study.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; K Kroenke; M Linzer; S R Hahn; J B Williams; F V deGruy; D Brody; M Davies
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: causal mediation of change.

Authors:  K I Howard; R J Lueger; M S Maling; Z Martinovich
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1993-08

10.  Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome.

Authors:  G Walter; M Cleary; J M Rey
Journal:  J Qual Clin Pract       Date:  1998-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  A Digital Feedback System to Support Implementation of Measurement-Based Care by School-Based Mental Health Clinicians.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Kelly Whitaker; Kristy Ludwig; Jessica Knaster Wasse; Elizabeth McCauley
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2017-03-02

2.  Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Current Assessment Practice Evaluation-Revised (CAPER) in a National Sample.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Shannon Dorsey; Prerna Martin; Alexandra A Grigore; Emily M Becker; Amanda Jensen-Doss
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Clinician use of standardized assessments following a common elements psychotherapy training and consultation program.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Shannon Dorsey; Michael Pullmann; Jessica Silbaugh-Cowdin; Lucy Berliner
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-01

4.  Field test of the feasibility and validity of using the Hoosier Assurance Plan Instrument for Adults in a state mental health program.

Authors:  Frederick L Newman; John McGrew; Richard N Deliberty
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-06-24

5.  Implementation of routine outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom: a critical perspective.

Authors:  C L Hall; M Moldavsky; J Taylor; K Sayal; M Marriott; M J Batty; S Pass; C Hollis
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle.

Authors:  Charlotte L Hall; Maria Moldavsky; Laurence Baldwin; Michael Marriott; Karen Newell; John Taylor; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.