Literature DB >> 18629507

[Patient reported outcomes. Relevance and application in ophthalmology].

R P Finger1, H P N Scholl, F G Holz.   

Abstract

The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) - standardized assessments by the patient of the impact of illness or therapy - has been met with increasing interest over the last years. Evidence generated from PROs is used not only to support claims in the drug regulatory process but is also used in political decision making and activities by the pharmaceutical industry. PROs can reflect the benefits of a treatment very well because the patient's quality of life is a central variable, and its preservation or improvement is certainly the main objective of any therapeutic intervention. The routine use of PROs is still hampered by several methodological problems. However, there are a number of advantages, such as improved interaction between physicians and patients and shared decision making, that may result in increased compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18629507     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-008-1804-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  22 in total

Review 1.  Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement.

Authors:  E S Paykel; R G Priest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

2.  [The version 2.0 of the SF-36 Health Survey: results of a population-representative study].

Authors:  Matthias Morfeld; Monika Bullinger; Juliane Nantke; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2005

3.  Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, and lens opacity: AREDS Report no. 14.

Authors:  Anne S Lindblad; Traci E Clemons
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

4.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review.

Authors:  J Greenhalgh; K Meadows
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Difference between ophthalmologists' and patients' perceptions of quality of life associated with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  G C Brown; M M Brown; S Sharma
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 8.  The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Physicians' assessment of functional health status and well-being. The patient's perspective.

Authors:  E L Schor; D J Lerner; S Malspeis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-13

10.  [Measuring patient's quality of life in ophthalmology].

Authors:  C Hirneiss; A S Neubauer; U Welge-Lüssen; K Eibl; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Psychometric properties of the FKS : Reliability, validity, Rasch analysis, and descriptive results of the German version of the Children's Visual Function Questionnaire].

Authors:  E Farin; M Metten; M Nagl; W A Lagrèze; C Pieh-Beisse
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Patient-reported and patient-weighted outcomes in ophthalmology].

Authors:  F Scheibler; R P Finger; R Grosselfinger; C-M Dintsios
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Self-reported vision in (gerontological) health services research and practice-an opening plea].

Authors:  J Köberlein-Neu; A Seifert; I Himmelsbach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Methods for estimating personal costs of disease using retinal diseases as an example].

Authors:  G Porz; H P N Scholl; F G Holz; R P Finger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  The Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) Questionnaire; Validation of the Thai-Version and the Implementation on Vision-Related Quality of Life in Thai Rural Community.

Authors:  Mansing Ratanasukon; Jongjit Tongsomboon; Patama Bhurayanontachai; Pichai Jirarattanasopa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.