Literature DB >> 9826048

Accurate time interval in repeated tonometry.

O F Recep1, H Hasiripi, E Vayisoglu, D Kalayci, H Sarikatipoglu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Determination of the accurate interval between the measurements in repeated tonometry.
METHODS: Two hundred-and-seventy subjects were randomly divided into 6 groups. Two successive intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed with Goldmann-type applanation tonometer at different time intervals in each group. The time intervals between the two measurements were 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 minutes. The results in each group were statistically analyzed with the significance test for matched observations.
RESULTS: We recorded a statistically significant difference between the first and the second IOP measurements at 1, 3, 4 and 5-minute-intervals. The differences were not significant at 2 and 10 minute-groups.
CONCLUSION: The time interval between successive IOP measurements should be 2 or 10 minutes for accurate tonometry.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9826048     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760518.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yildirim; Afsun Şahin; Ertuğrul Çolak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Shibal Bhartiya; Shveta Jindal Bali; Reetika Sharma; Neha Chaturvedi; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Reliability of tonosafe disposable tonometer prisms: clinical implications from the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System Quality Assurance Study.

Authors:  V Thomas; M K Daly; T Cakiner-Egilmez; E Baker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?

Authors:  Kunjan Jayantilal Patel; Saurabh P Jain; Priti R Kapadia; Nikunj V Patel; Saurabh Patel; Vikas Patel
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.

Authors:  Martin Zimmermann; Susanne Pitz; Irene Schmidtmann; Norbert Pfeiffer; Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Nilgün Yıldırım; Emre Tambova; Afsun Şahin
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-07-09

8.  Intraocular Pressure Based on Dynamic Bidirectional Applanation and Air-puff Tonometry: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ayse E Bahadir Kilavuzoglu; Cemile B Cosar; Ali Rc Celebi; Ugur E Al Parmak
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2019 May-Aug

9.  Test retest variability of TonoPen AVIA.

Authors:  Shibal Bhartiya; Shveta J Bali; Mathew James; Anita Panda; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Biomechanical parameters of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal eyes.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; Richard A Russell; Angelos Sinapis; Sayeh Pourjavan; Dimitros Sinapis; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.