Literature DB >> 24049126

Hormonal determinants of nipple aspirate fluid yield among breast cancer cases and screening controls.

Angela J Fought1, Claire McGathey, Denise M Scholtens, Richard E Heinz, Rick Lowe, Yvonne B Feeney, Oukseub Lee, Thomas E Kmiecik, Judith A Wolfman, Charles V Clevenger, Peter H Gann, Susan Gapstur, Robert T Chatterton, Seema A Khan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nipple aspiration fluid (NAF) use as a biosample is limited by the variable yield across studies. We investigated the endocrine determinants of yield in an ongoing breast cancer case-control study.
METHODS: One-hundred and eighteen women yielding ≥2 μL NAF and 120 non-yielders were included; serum hormones were measured; differences in median hormones were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. ORs and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for yielder status relative to hormone levels were estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for parity and lactation, and, in premenopausal women, menstrual cycle phase (MCP).
RESULTS: Prolactin concentrations were higher in yielders than non-yielders (premenopausal: 7.6 and 2.5 ng/mL, P < 0.01; postmenopausal 5.3 and 2.2 ng/mL; P < 0.01). Among premenopausal-yielders, estradiol was lower (64.3 vs. 90.5 pg/mL, MCP-adjusted P = 0.02). In separate menopausal status and parity-adjusted models, significant case-control differences persisted in prolactin: case OR 1.93 (95% CI, 1.35-2.77), control OR 1.64 (95% CI, 1.17-2.29). Premenopausal control yielders had higher progesterone (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.18-2.46) and sex-hormone binding-globulin (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.08-4.05) than non-yielders. Among parous women, further adjustment for lactation suggested a stronger positive association of serum prolactin with yield in cases than controls.
CONCLUSION: NAF-yielders show higher prolactin than non-yielders, regardless of menopause and parity; implications of this and other endocrine differences on NAF biomarkers of breast cancer risk deserve further study. IMPACT: NAF yield is associated with a distinct endocrine environment that must be considered in studies of NAF-based breast cancer risk markers. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24049126      PMCID: PMC4101805          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  25 in total

1.  Cellular and hormonal content of breast nipple aspirate fluid in relation to the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Seema A Khan; Robert T Chatterton
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.851

2.  Associations of body size and reproductive factors with circulating levels of sex hormones and prolactin in premenopausal Japanese women.

Authors:  Chisato Nagata; Keiko Wada; Kozue Nakamura; Makoto Hayashi; Noriyuki Takeda; Keigo Yasuda
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cytologic evaluation of breast fluid in the detection of breast disease.

Authors:  O W Sartorius; H S Smith; P Morris; D Benedict; L Friesen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Nipple fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and prostate-specific antigen in cancer-bearing and tumor-free breasts.

Authors:  Y Zhao; S J Verselis; N Klar; N L Sadowsky; C M Kaelin; B Smith; L Foretova; F P Li
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Breast cancer risk in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid.

Authors:  M R Wrensch; N L Petrakis; R Miike; E B King; K Chew; J Neuhaus; M M Lee; M Rhys
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-12-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Serum prolactin in breastfeeding: state of the science.

Authors:  P D Hill; R T Chatterton; J C Aldag
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 7.  The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  Charles V Clevenger; Priscilla A Furth; Susan E Hankinson; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid.

Authors:  M R Wrensch; N L Petrakis; E B King; R Miike; L Mason; K L Chew; M M Lee; V L Ernster; J F Hilton; R Schweitzer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Nipple aspirate cytology for the study of breast cancer precursors.

Authors:  E B King; K L Chew; N L Petrakis; V L Ernster
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Prolactin-stimulated growth of cell cultures established from malignant Nb rat lymphomas.

Authors:  P W Gout; C T Beer; R L Noble
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  2 in total

1.  Repeated nipple fluid aspiration: compliance and feasibility results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  J S de Groot; C B Moelans; S G Elias; A Hennink; B Verolme; K P M Suijkerbuijk; A Jager; C Seynaeve; P Bos; A J Witkamp; M G E M Ausems; P J van Diest; E van der Wall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Protein identification from dried nipple aspirate fluid on Guthrie cards using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lucas Delmonico; Vivian Rabello Areias; Rodrigo César Pinto; Cintia Da Silva Matos; Marco Felipe Franco Rosa; Carolina Maria De Azevedo; Gilda Alves
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.952

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.