Literature DB >> 9811862

Genetic instability of cancer cells is proportional to their degree of aneuploidy.

P Duesberg1, C Rausch, D Rasnick, R Hehlmann.   

Abstract

Genetic and phenotypic instability are hallmarks of cancer cells, but their cause is not clear. The leading hypothesis suggests that a poorly defined gene mutation generates genetic instability and that some of many subsequent mutations then cause cancer. Here we investigate the hypothesis that genetic instability of cancer cells is caused by aneuploidy, an abnormal balance of chromosomes. Because symmetrical segregation of chromosomes depends on exactly two copies of mitosis genes, aneuploidy involving chromosomes with mitosis genes will destabilize the karyotype. The hypothesis predicts that the degree of genetic instability should be proportional to the degree of aneuploidy. Thus it should be difficult, if not impossible, to maintain the particular karyotype of a highly aneuploid cancer cell on clonal propagation. This prediction was confirmed with clonal cultures of chemically transformed, aneuploid Chinese hamster embryo cells. It was found that the higher the ploidy factor of a clone, the more unstable was its karyotype. The ploidy factor is the quotient of the modal chromosome number divided by the normal number of the species. Transformed Chinese hamster embryo cells with a ploidy factor of 1.7 were estimated to change their karyotype at a rate of about 3% per generation, compared with 1.8% for cells with a ploidy factor of 0.95. Because the background noise of karyotyping is relatively high, the cells with low ploidy factor may be more stable than our method suggests. The karyotype instability of human colon cancer cell lines, recently analyzed by Lengnauer et al. [Lengnauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. (1997) Nature (London) 386, 623-627], also corresponds exactly to their degree of aneuploidy. We conclude that aneuploidy is sufficient to explain genetic instability and the resulting karyotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity of cancer cells, independent of gene mutation. Because aneuploidy has also been proposed to cause cancer, our hypothesis offers a common, unique mechanism of altering and simultaneously destabilizing normal cellular phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9811862      PMCID: PMC24881          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

1.  Dominant effects of tubulin overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D Burke; P Gasdaska; L Hartwell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  A view of the relation between carcinogenesis and mutagenesis.

Authors:  W Lijinsky
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 3.  Genetic convergence and divergence in tumor progression.

Authors:  S Heim; N Mandahl; F Mitelman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Prevalence of ras gene mutations in human colorectal cancers.

Authors:  J L Bos; E R Fearon; S R Hamilton; M Verlaan-de Vries; J H van Boom; A J van der Eb; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 28-Jun 3       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Cancer as a dynamic developmental disorder.

Authors:  H Rubin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Toxic effects of excess cloned centromeres.

Authors:  B Futcher; J Carbon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Constitutional chromosome instability and cancer risk.

Authors:  S Heim; B Johansson; F Mertens
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Aneuploidy in mammalian somatic cells in vivo.

Authors:  M C Cimino; R R Tice; J C Liang
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1986 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Expression of cloned sequences in biopsies of human colonic tissue and in colonic carcinoma cells induced to differentiate in vitro.

Authors:  L H Augenlicht; M Z Wahrman; H Halsey; L Anderson; J Taylor; M Lipkin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Chromosome error propagation and cancer.

Authors:  R Holliday
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  99 in total

1.  Evidence of chromosomal instability in prostate cancer determined by spectral karyotyping (SKY) and interphase fish analysis.

Authors:  B Beheshti; P C Park; J M Sweet; J Trachtenberg; M A Jewett; J A Squire
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Origin of multidrug resistance in cells with and without multidrug resistance genes: chromosome reassortments catalyzed by aneuploidy.

Authors:  P Duesberg; R Stindl; R Hehlmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Auto-catalysed progression of aneuploidy explains the Hayflick limit of cultured cells, carcinogen-induced tumours in mice, and the age distribution of human cancer.

Authors:  D Rasnick
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Tetraploid state induces p53-dependent arrest of nontransformed mammalian cells in G1.

Authors:  P R Andreassen; O D Lohez; F B Lacroix; R L Margolis
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  Chromosomes and cancer cells.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  Mechanisms of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Samuel F Bakhoum; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Crypt dynamics and colorectal cancer: advances in mathematical modelling.

Authors:  I M M van Leeuwen; H M Byrne; O E Jensen; J R King
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Whole chromosome gain does not in itself confer cancer-like chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Anders Valind; Yuesheng Jin; Bo Baldetorp; David Gisselsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Variable levels of chromosomal instability and mitotic spindle checkpoint defects in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dae-Sung Yoon; Robert P Wersto; Weibo Zhou; Francis J Chrest; Elizabeth S Garrett; Teag Kyu Kwon; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis.

Authors:  Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.