Literature DB >> 24041940

A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis.

Jason M Sheltzer1.   

Abstract

Aneuploidy is invariably associated with poor proliferation of primary cells, but the specific contributions of abnormal karyotypes to cancer, a disease characterized by aneuploidy and dysregulated proliferation, remain unclear. In this study, I demonstrate that the transcriptional alterations caused by aneuploidy in primary cells are also present in chromosomally unstable cancer cell lines, but the same alterations are not common to all aneuploid cancers. Chromosomally unstable cancer lines and aneuploid primary cells also share an increase in glycolytic and TCA cycle flux. The biological response to aneuploidy is associated with cellular stress and slow proliferation, and a 70-gene signature derived from primary aneuploid cells was defined as a strong predictor of increased survival in several cancers. Inversely, a transcriptional signature derived from clonal aneuploidy in tumors correlated with high mitotic activity and poor prognosis. Together, these findings suggested that there are two types of aneuploidy in cancer: one is clonal aneuploidy, which is selected during tumor evolution and associated with robust growth, and the other is subclonal aneuploidy caused by chromosomal instability (CIN). Subclonal aneuploidy more closely resembles the stressed state of primary aneuploid cells, yet CIN is not benign; a subset of genes upregulated in high-CIN cancers predict aggressive disease in human patients in a proliferation-independent manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041940      PMCID: PMC3901577          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  58 in total

Review 1.  The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells.

Authors:  Thomas Ried; Yue Hu; Michael J Difilippantonio; B Michael Ghadimi; Marian Grade; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  2n or not 2n: Aneuploidy, polyploidy and chromosomal instability in primary and tumor cells.

Authors:  Lauren M Zasadil; Eric M C Britigan; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice.

Authors:  Rocío Sotillo; Eva Hernando; Elena Díaz-Rodríguez; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Carlos Cordón-Cardo; Scott W Lowe; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  p53 gene mutations occur in combination with 17p allelic deletions as late events in colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  S J Baker; A C Preisinger; J M Jessup; C Paraskeva; S Markowitz; J K Willson; S Hamilton; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers.

Authors:  Scott L Carter; Aron C Eklund; Isaac S Kohane; Lyndsay N Harris; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Chromosomal instability is associated with higher expression of genes implicated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cancer invasiveness, and metastasis and with lower expression of genes involved in cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, and chromatin maintenance.

Authors:  Anna V Roschke; Oleg K Glebov; Samir Lababidi; Kristen S Gehlhaus; John N Weinstein; Ilan R Kirsch
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  Whole chromosome instability caused by Bub1 insufficiency drives tumorigenesis through tumor suppressor gene loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  Darren J Baker; Fang Jin; Karthik B Jeganathan; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  The incidence of p53 mutations increases with progression of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  J O Boyle; J Hakim; W Koch; P van der Riet; R H Hruban; R A Roa; R Correo; Y J Eby; J M Ruppert; D Sidransky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  CellMiner: a relational database and query tool for the NCI-60 cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Uma T Shankavaram; Sudhir Varma; David Kane; Margot Sunshine; Krishna K Chary; William C Reinhold; Yves Pommier; John N Weinstein
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  34 in total

1.  Single-chromosome Gains Commonly Function as Tumor Suppressors.

Authors:  Jason M Sheltzer; Julie H Ko; John M Replogle; Nicole C Habibe Burgos; Erica S Chung; Colleen M Meehl; Nicole M Sayles; Verena Passerini; Zuzana Storchova; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 2.  Too much to handle - how gaining chromosomes destabilizes the genome.

Authors:  Verena Passerini; Zuzana Storchová
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Determinants of nutrient limitation in cancer.

Authors:  Mark R Sullivan; Matthew G Vander Heiden
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.250

4.  Too much to differentiate: aneuploidy promotes proliferation and teratoma formation in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Zuzana Storchová
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer.

Authors:  Laurent Sansregret; Bart Vanhaesebroeck; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy.

Authors:  Stefano Santaguida; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Single-Chromosomal Gains Can Function as Metastasis Suppressors and Promoters in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Anand Vasudevan; Prasamit S Baruah; Joan C Smith; Zihua Wang; Nicole M Sayles; Peter Andrews; Jude Kendall; Justin Leu; Narendra Kumar Chunduri; Dan Levy; Michael Wigler; Zuzana Storchová; Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Aneuploidy increases resistance to chemotherapeutics by antagonizing cell division.

Authors:  John Michael Replogle; Wen Zhou; Adrianna E Amaro; James M McFarland; Mariana Villalobos-Ortiz; Jeremy Ryan; Anthony Letai; Omer Yilmaz; Jason Sheltzer; Stephen J Lippard; Uri Ben-David; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.

Authors:  Marco Raffaele Cosenza; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.