Literature DB >> 21053112

Operated and adjacent segment motions for fusion versus cervical arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Tomoya Terai1, Ahmad Faizan, Koichi Sairyo, Vijay K Goel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) represent the standard treatment for cervical spondylolytic radiculopathy and myelopathy. To achieve solid fusion, appropriate compressive loading of the graft and stability are essential. Fusion may lead to adjacent segment degeneration. Artificial discs have been introduced as motion-preserving devices to reduce the risk of fusion-related complications. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked: (1) Does the use of a plate reduce motion at the operated level and bone graft compression compared to fusion with bone graft alone; and (2) is adjacent-segment motion higher after fusion with a plate?
METHODS: Motions and compressive loads in the graft were quantified for intact, C4-C5 ACDF without and with a plate, and total disc arthroplasty in human cadaver spines.
RESULTS: At the surgery level all motions decreased for ACDF with a plate. The motions were similar to intact motions after total disc arthroplasty. The motions across the adjacent segment increased after fusion in all loading modes except lateral bending and were closer to the intact for the total disc arthroplasty case. The plate maintained a compressive load on the graft with a maximum increase in extension.
CONCLUSIONS: Unlike fusion, the arthroplasty can restore motion to normal at the surgery and adjacent segments, compared to fusion cases. A cervical plate with a precompression of the graft provides enhanced stability and fusion due to improved compression. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings support the clinical observations that fusion may lead to the degeneration of the adjacent segments. Disc arthroplasty may be able to circumvent the adjacent segment degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21053112      PMCID: PMC3032848          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1646-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.

Authors:  Darrel S Brodke; Sohrab Gollogly; Kent N Bachus; R Alexander Mohr; Bao-Khang N Nguyen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Anterior cervical plating.

Authors:  V Gonugunta; A A Krishnaney; E C Benzel
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Ung-Kyu Chang; Daniel H Kim; Max C Lee; Rafer Willenberg; Se-Hoon Kim; Jesse Lim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-07

4.  Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single- and multiple-level.

Authors:  Shuhua Yang; Xinghuo Wu; Yong Hu; Jin Li; Guohui Liu; Weihua Xu; Cao Yang; Shunan Ye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The spinal lax zone and neutral zone: measurement techniques and parameter comparisons.

Authors:  N R Crawford; J D Peles; C A Dickman
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-10

6.  Anterior cervical plate stabilization in one- and two-level degenerative disease: overtreatment or benefit?

Authors:  W Caspar; F H Geisler; T Pitzen; T A Johnson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-02

Review 7.  [Immediate and early treatment of traumatic paraplegias].

Authors:  J Böhler
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1967-10

8.  Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.

Authors:  Gwynedd E Pickett; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Francis H Shen; Craig Lyon; Mathew Phillips; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hybrid Solutions for the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Disk Disease.

Authors:  Stefan Alexander König; Sebastian Ranguis; Uwe Spetzger
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 2.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Lei Zang; Ning Fan; Yong Hai; S B Lu; Q J Su; J C Yang; Peng Du; Y J Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Anastasia Tasiou; Theofanis Giannis; Alexandros G Brotis; Ioannis Siasios; Iordanis Georgiadis; Haralampos Gatos; Eleni Tsianaka; Konstantinos Vagkopoulos; Konstantinos Paterakis; Kostas N Fountas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

5.  In vitro-analysis of kinematics and intradiscal pressures in cervical arthroplasty versus fusion--A biomechanical study in a sheep model with two semi-constrained prosthesis.

Authors:  Dorothea Daentzer; Bastian Welke; Christof Hurschler; Nathalie Husmann; Christina Jansen; Christian Heinrich Flamme; Berna Ida Richter
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Incidence and clinical outcomes of patients requiring anterior versus posterior repeat cervical fusion.

Authors:  Mohamad Bydon; Risheng Xu; Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Mohamed Macki; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-04-16

7.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Prosthesis Based on the Physiological Curvature of Endplate for Cervical Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Yu; Ding-Jun Hao; Da-Geng Huang; Li-Xiong Qian; Hang Feng; Hou-Kun Li; Song-Chuan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A study on the clinical outcomes of patients with revision surgery for adjacent segment disease after 10-year's anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Jia Li; Tong Tong; Ruijie Niu; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.

Authors:  Jigang Lou; Yuanchao Li; Beiyu Wang; Yang Meng; Tingkui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.