Literature DB >> 9807585

Proximal femur: assessment for osteoporosis with T2* decay characteristics at MR imaging.

T M Link1, S Majumdar, P Augat, J C Lin, D Newitt, N E Lane, H K Genant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use T2* measurements at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to investigate the trabecular structure of the hip in women with and women without osteoporotic hip fractures and to compare this technique with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in the diagnosis of fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2* maps of the proximal femur were obtained at 1.5 T in 23 postmenopausal study patients with osteoporotic hip fractures, 27 age-matched healthy postmenopausal control subjects, and five healthy premenopausal control subjects. A modified gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state, or GRASS, sequence was used with echo times of 4-40 msec at 4-msec increments. T2* values were measured in five regions of interest: femoral neck, the Ward triangle, trochanter, intertrochanteric region, and total proximal femur. Additionally, BMD measurements of the hip were obtained with dual x-ray absorptiometry.
RESULTS: Significant differences between T2* measurements were obtained in all three groups (P < .05). BMD measurements of the hip also showed significant differences (P < .05). For T2* and BMD measurements, odds ratios and areas under the curve in receiver operating characteristic analysis were comparable. Correlations between 1/T2* values and BMD were significant (P < .05). T2* measurements in the proximal femur showed regional variations.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging decay characteristics of bone marrow could be used to differentiate between postmenopausal women with and those without osteoporotic hip fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9807585     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.2.9807585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

Review 1.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Roland Krug; S Banerjee; E T Han; D C Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Echo-spacing optimization for the simultaneous measurement of reversible (R2') and irreversible (R2) transverse relaxation rates.

Authors:  Ruitian Song; Hee Kwon Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Cylinders or walls? A new computational model to estimate the MR transverse relaxation rate dependence on trabecular bone architecture.

Authors:  Bernd Müller-Bierl; Olivia Louis; Yves Fierens; Nico Buls; Robert Luypaert; Johan de Mey
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Bone fragility and imaging techniques.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Elia; Giuseppe Caracchini; Loredana Cavalli; Paolo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

8.  Evaluation of vertebral bone marrow fat content by chemical-shift MRI in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gokhan Gokalp; Fatma Senturk Mutlu; Zeynep Yazici; Nalan Yildirim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Noninvasive imaging of bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Janina M Patsch; Andrew J Burghardt; Galateia Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Characterization of trabecular bone density with ultra-short echo-time MRI at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T--comparison with micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Moritz C Wurnig; Maurizio Calcagni; David Kenkel; Magdalena Vich; Markus Weiger; Gustav Andreisek; Felix W Wehrli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.