Literature DB >> 17058137

A questionnaire survey of patient preparation and techniques for prostate biopsy among urologists in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions of Japan.

Masanori Noguchi1, Kei Matsuoka, Hirofumi Koga, Hiroshi Kanetake, Masayuki Nakagawa, Seiji Naito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We surveyed urologists in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions of Japan regarding their standard approach to patient preparation and their prostate biopsy technique.
METHODS: A total of 155 survey questionnaires were prepared and mailed to community and academic urologists in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions. Incidences were derived from the total numbers of responses, by item, divided by the total number of responses per practice type.
RESULTS: There were 27 responses from clinics (17.4%), 115 from general hospitals (74.2%), and 13 from university hospitals or cancer centers (8.4%). Most urologists performed biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels greater than 4 ng/ml when digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) results were normal. Of the urologists, 83% reported performing the procedure with hospitalization; 51% of urologists do not advocate enema use, 69% performed the procedure under spinal anesthesia or a sacral block, 53% reported the combined administration of antibiotics orally and intramuscularly or intravenously, 70% used only the transrectal route for prostate biopsy, and 86.5% performed six or more biopsy cores at the initial prostate biopsy session.
CONCLUSION: This survey shows substantial variation in the prostate biopsy protocols among urologists in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions in Japan, and suggests that national, evidence-based, guidelines are required, particularly as to antibiotic prophylaxis and the number of biopsy cores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17058137     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-006-0592-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  17 in total

1.  Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate. Do enemas decrease clinically significant complications?

Authors:  J M Carey; H J Korman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prostate cancer detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; D K Ornstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The use of prophylactic antibiotics in ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  H M Taylor; J B Bingham
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  The procedure of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a survey of patient preparation and biopsy technique.

Authors:  Michael Davis; Mario Sofer; Sandy S Kim; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  A Zisman; D Leibovici; J Kleinmann; Y I Siegel; A Lindner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C K Naughton; D S Smith; P A Humphrey; W J Catalona; D W Keetch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A double-blind study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in patients having transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  T K Ruebush; J H McConville; F M Calia
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Efficacy of one dose fluoroquinolone before prostate biopsy.

Authors:  K C Shandera; G P Thibault; G E Deshon
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Single dose levofloxacin prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in patients at low risk.

Authors:  Brian C Griffith; Allen F Morey; Mustafa M Ali-Khan; Edith Canby-Hagino; John P Foley; Thomas A Rozanski
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does periprostatic local anesthesia for prostate biopsy affect the operative difficulty of open radical prostatectomy? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Ken Aikawa; Kei Ishibashi; Tomohiko Yanagida; Norio Takahashi; Souichiro Ogawa; Toshiki Oguro; Masao Kataoka; Chiharu Irisawa; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Continued administration of antithrombotic agents during transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Toko Asano; Shuichiro Kobayashi; Masataka Yano; Yukihiro Otsuka; Satoshi Kitahara
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.