Literature DB >> 9800236

PET in breast cancer.

F L Flanagan1, F Dehdashti, B A Siegel.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, the role of radiology in breast cancer has changed significantly because of the technical advances in mammography, greater use of ultrasonography, and the emergence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as development of functional imaging techniques that add new dimensions to the noninvasive evaluation of patients with breast cancer. Currently, radiological evaluation of breast cancer is important not only for early detection of this disease, but also for staging, assessing certain prognostic factors, and monitoring response to treatment. This review focuses on the potential applications and limitations of positron emission tomography (PET) as a functional imaging method in breast cancer. PET with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been used successfully in an increasing number of oncological applications and is considered a valuable adjunct to anatomical imaging methods, providing unique functional information for better characterization of disease. The contributions of PET to breast cancer imaging can be considered in two main categories. First, by providing qualitative and/or quantitative information, FDG-PET can aid in detection and discrimination of breast cancer in its primary location. Although, FDG-PET is certainly not necessary in every potential case of breast cancer, it can be very useful in clinically and radiologically "difficult-to-examine breasts," eg, following breast surgery. Qualitative assessment of the extent of the tumor spread provides prognostic information and allows for selection of appropriate therapy. The identification of tumor spread to the axillary nodes or to more remote nodal groups, i.e., internal mammary, or supraclavicular nodes, is probably the most practical information that qualitative FDG-PET can offer. Although it is still too early to formulate definite clinical recommendations, it appears likely that FDG-PET has the potential to reduce the number of patients requiring nodal dissection. Second, PET imaging can provide an assessment of the biological behavior of breast cancer. Quantitative and/or semi-quantitative FDG-PET yields valuable information regarding prognosis and response to therapy in a timely fashion. Preliminary studies have indicated that serial assessment of tumor metabolism by FDG-PET early during effective chemohormonotherapy may predict subsequent response to such therapy. The use of PET with the estrogen analogue 16 alpha-[18F]fluoro-17 beta-estradiol (FES) to monitor receptor function and response to hormonal therapy opens up intriguing new ways to monitor patients with breast cancer at a cellular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9800236     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(98)80034-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  18 in total

1.  Relationship Between FDG Uptake and the Platelet/lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Breast Invasive Ductal Cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujii; Shoko Tokuda; Yuko Nakazawa; Sasagu Kurozumi; Sayaka Obayashi; Reina Yajima; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  T S Kim; W K Moon; D S Lee; J K Chung; M C Lee; Y K Youn; S K Oh; K J Choe; D Y Noh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; K Scheidhauer; A Scharl; U-J Goering; P Theissen; H Kugel; T Krahe; U Pietrzyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivier Couturier; André Luxen; Jean-François Chatal; Jean-Philippe Vuillez; Pierre Rigo; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  18F-FDG uptake in lung, breast, and colon cancers: molecular biology correlates and disease characterization.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Abass Alavi; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The relationship between vascular and metabolic characteristics of primary breast tumours.

Authors:  Scott I K Semple; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas W Redpath; Roger T Staff; Trevor S Ahearn; Andrew E Welch; Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Elizabeth H Smyth; Shailesh Chaturvedi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Muna M Baslaim; Siema M Bakheet; Razan Bakheet; Adnan Ezzat; Mahmoud El-Foudeh; Asma Tulbah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  K Scheidhauer; C Walter; M D Seemann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Triple-negative and non-triple-negative invasive breast cancer: association between MR and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging.

Authors:  Marjan S Bolouri; Sjoerd G Elias; Dorota J Wisner; Spencer C Behr; Randall A Hawkins; Sachiko A Suzuki; Krysta S Banfield; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.