Literature DB >> 9797565

Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint.

T Boegård1, O Rudling, I F Petersson, K Jonsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes in the axial and lateral view of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) and (1) magnetic resonance (MR) detected cartilage defects in the same joint and (2) knee pain.
METHODS: Fifty-seven people with chronic knee pain, (aged 41-58 years, mean 50 years) were examined with axial and lateral radiograms when standing of the right and the left PFJ. The presence and grade of osteophytes was assessed. On the same day, a MR examination was performed of the signal knee with proton density and T2 weighted turbo spin-echo sequences in the sagittal and axial view on a 1.0 T imager. Cartilage defects in the PFJ were noted. The subjects were questioned for current knee pain for each knee.
RESULTS: Osteophytes at the PFJ had a specificity varying between 59 and 100% and a positive predictive value between 74 and 100% for MR detected cartilage defects. The corresponding values for osteophytes at the lateral aspect of the femoral trochlea were both 100%. In PFJ with narrowing (< 5 mm) osteophytes had a sensitivity and a positive predictive value of 90 and 95% respectively for MR detected cartilage defects, while in PFJ with non-narrowing (> or = 5 mm) the corresponding values were 75 and 65% and the specificity was 50%. A correlation (p < 0.05) between osteophytes at the inferior pole of the patella and knee pain was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Osteophytes at the PFJ are associated with MR detected cartilage defects in the same joint. The relation was strong for osteophytes at the lateral femoral trochlea and in the PFJ with narrowing (< 5 mm), but weak in the PFJ with non-narrowing (> or = 5 mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797565      PMCID: PMC1752672          DOI: 10.1136/ard.57.7.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  23 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Joint-space width in the axial view of the patello-femoral joint. Definitions and comparison with MR imaging.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; J Sanfridsson; T Saxne; B Svensson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 3.  MR imaging.

Authors:  C G Peterfy
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-11

4.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage.

Authors:  D G Disler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Assessing progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a comparison between two radiographic methods.

Authors:  P Lanyon; A Jones; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee classified by the Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence systems for the tibiofemoral joint in people aged 35-54 years with chronic knee pain.

Authors:  I F Petersson; T Boegård; T Saxne; A J Silman; B Svensson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R D Altman; M Hochberg; W A Murphy; F Wolfe; M Lequesne
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.

Authors:  M P Recht; D W Piraino; G A Paletta; J P Schils; G H Belhobek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Association of pain with radiological changes in different compartments and views of the knee joint.

Authors:  F M Cicuttini; J Baker; D J Hart; T D Spector
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Choosing the best method for radiological assessment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F M Cicuttini; J Baker; D J Hart; T D Spector
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  19 in total

1.  Correlation between radiographic findings of osteoarthritis and arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration within the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Donna Blankenbaker; Paul Stanton; Jason Fine; Arthur De Smet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Is the degree of osteophyte formation associated with the symptoms and functions in the patellofemoral joint in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ilkyu Han; Chong Bum Chang; Jung-Ah Choi; Yeon Gwi Kang; Sang Cheol Seong; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Joint space predicts THA after hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Karen K Briggs; John C Carlisle; Diana C Patterson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Association of ADAM12-S protein with radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and bone and cartilage markers.

Authors:  I Kerna; K Kisand; P Laitinen; A E Tamm; J Kumm; M Lintrop; A O Tamm
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Development of a logically devised line drawing atlas for grading of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Y Nagaosa; M Mateus; B Hassan; P Lanyon; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Occupational kneeling and radiographic tibiofemoral and patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Søren Rytter; Niels Egund; Lilli Kirkeskov Jensen; Jens Peter Bonde
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice.

Authors:  Lars V von Engelhardt; Matthias Lahner; André Klussmann; Bertil Bouillon; Andreas Dàvid; Patrick Haage; Thomas K Lichtinger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Objective assessments of medial osteoarthritic knee severity by MRI: new computer software to evaluate femoral condyle contours.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Ochiai; Takahisa Sasho; Masamichi Tahara; Atsuya Watanabe; Kei Matsuki; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Yoichi Miyake; Toshiya Nakaguchi; Yuichi Wada; Hideshige Moriya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Correlation of WOMAC and KOOS scores to tibiofemoral cartilage loss on plain radiography and 3 Tesla MRI: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Kenneth David Illingworth; Youssef El Bitar; Kyle Siewert; Steven L Scaife; Saadiq El-Amin; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radiographic assessment of the femorotibial joint of the CCLT rabbit experimental model of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Caroline B Boulocher; Eric R Viguier; Rodrigo Da Rocha Cararo; Didier J Fau; Fabien Arnault; Fabien Collard; Pierre A Maitre; Olivier Roualdes; Marie-Eve Duclos; Eric P Vignon; Thierry W Roger
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.