Literature DB >> 9014580

Assessing progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a comparison between two radiographic methods.

P Lanyon1, A Jones, M Doherty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two plain radiographic methods for sensitivity to detect progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
METHODS: Two sets of paired skyline and lateral knee radiographs from 54 hospital referred patients (108 knees) with knee osteoarthritis were taken an average of 31 months apart (range 12-40). Films were examined separately in random order by a single observer blind to patient identity and time order. Minimum joint space was measured by metered caliper; individual features of osteoarthritis were graded 0-3 using an atlas.
RESULTS: Intraobserver reproducibility assessed on 40 knees was to within +/- 0.5 mm for skyline lateral facet and +/- 0.7 mm for medial facet and lateral views. On the lateral view measured joint space decreased in 51% of knees but increased in 43%, with overall no significant mean group change with time (-0.2 mm, 95% confidence interval, 0.1 to -0.5). By contrast on the skyline view joint space decreased in at least one facet in 71% of knees, with significant decrease in mean joint space for both lateral facets (-0.4 mm, 95% CI, -0.2 to -0.6) and medial facets (-0.5 mm, 95% CI, -0.1 to -0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to detect significant joint space loss with time on the skyline view that is not apparent on the lateral view. The skyline view should be the method of choice to detect progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9014580      PMCID: PMC1010337          DOI: 10.1136/ard.55.12.875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  12 in total

1.  Radiographic assessment of the knee joint in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C Cooper; J Cushnaghan; J R Kirwan; P A Dieppe; J Rogers; T McAlindon; F McCrae
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence.

Authors:  A C Merchant; R L Mercer; R H Jacobsen; C R Cool
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Protocols for precise radio-anatomical positioning of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments of the knee.

Authors:  C Buckland-Wright
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; S Snow; C Cooper; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  The tangential x-ray investigation of the patellofemoral joint: x-ray technique, diagnostic criteria and their interpretation.

Authors:  C A Laurin; R Dussault; H P Levesque
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Radiographic assessment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A C Jones; J Ledingham; T McAlindon; M Regan; D Hart; P J MacMillan; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R D Altman; M Hochberg; W A Murphy; F Wolfe; M Lequesne
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Guidelines for testing slow acting drugs in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M Lequesne; K Brandt; N Bellamy; R Moskowitz; C J Menkes; J P Pelletier; R Altman
Journal:  J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1994-09

10.  Choosing the best method for radiological assessment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F M Cicuttini; J Baker; D J Hart; T D Spector
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  11 in total

1.  Does increasing the grades of the knee osteoarthritis line drawing atlas alter its clinimetric properties?

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; A J Carr; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Semi-automated digital image analysis of patellofemoral joint space width from lateral knee radiographs.

Authors:  S J Grochowski; K K Amrami; K Kaufman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: definitions and normal joint space.

Authors:  P Lanyon; S O'Reilly; A Jones; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Short-term repeatability of joint space width measurements using a magnetic resonance imaging compatible knee positioning device.

Authors:  M F Koff; D W Stanley; P J Weishaar; K K Amrami; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  The knee skyline radiograph: its usefulness in the diagnosis of patello-femoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Bhattacharya; V Kumar; E Safawi; P Finn; A C Hui
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Expert consensus on surgical treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Central South University National Clinical Research Center For Geriatric Disorders Xiangya Hospital
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

7.  Development of a logically devised line drawing atlas for grading of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Y Nagaosa; M Mateus; B Hassan; P Lanyon; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Minimum joint space width (mJSW) of patellofemoral joint on standing "skyline" radiographs: test-retest reproducibility and comparison with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI).

Authors:  Paolo Simoni; Sanaa Jamali; Adelin Albert; Saara Totterman; Edward Schreyer; Jose G Tamez-Peña; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Victoria Alvarez Miezentseva; Philippe Gillet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Radiologic assessment of patellofemoral pain in the athlete.

Authors:  Yoshimi Endo; Beth E Shubin Stein; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.