Literature DB >> 23292888

Joint space predicts THA after hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older.

Marc J Philippon1, Karen K Briggs, John C Carlisle, Diana C Patterson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All patients considering joint-preserving hip arthroscopy should be educated on the risk of THA after arthroscopy. The degree of radiographic osteoarthritis predicts subsequent THA. To provide patients with the best information, the best radiographic measure that predicts THA after hip arthroscopy should be identified. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined if Tönnis grade, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, or joint space narrowing was superior in predicting THA after hip arthroscopy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 203 patients 50 years of age or older treated with hip arthroscopy between March 2007 and October 2010. Of these, 96 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Sixty-five did not undergo THAs during the followup time (non-THA group) and 31 patients did (THA group). We determined Tönnis grade, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and/or joint space narrowing before arthroscopy. The median followup for the non-THA group was 54 months (95% confidence interval, 49.9-58.9 months).
RESULTS: In 81% of the patients, joint space accurately predicted THA or non-THA, whereas Kellgren-Lawrence was accurate in 73% and Tönnis grade was accurate in 65%. On binary logistic regression, the only predictor (r(2) = 0.45) of THA was joint space of 2 mm or less.
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring joint space by determining if any measurement is 2 mm or less predicts patients progressing to THA after hip arthroscopy approximately 80% of the time. At this early time point, joint space measurements were the most accurate predictor of THA and should be used in patient education to define the risk of early failure from hip arthroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292888      PMCID: PMC3705033          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2779-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic predictors of intra-articular hip disease in arthroscopy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Carlisle; Ryan M Nunley; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Robert Trousdale; Young-Jo Kim; Paul E Beaule; Patrick Morgan; Karen Steger-May; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Variables associated with the progression of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexis A Wright; Chad Cook; J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-07-15

4.  Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Bruno G Schroder E Souza; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Arthroscopic treatment of labral tears in femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative study of refixation and resection with a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  E Schilders; A Dimitrakopoulou; Q Bismil; P Marchant; C Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-08

6.  Is radiology a determinant of pain, stiffness, and functional disability in knee osteoarthritis? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Divya Sanghi; Sachin Avasthi; Abhishek Mishra; Ajai Singh; Sarita Agarwal; Rajeshwar Nath Srivastava
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Hip arthroscopy for labral tears: review of clinical outcomes with 4.8-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; Roger Componovo; Keith Baldwin; Craig L Israelite; Charles L Nelson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; R Brian Maxwell; Todd L Johnston; Mara Schenker; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration.

Authors:  K D Brandt; R S Fife; E M Braunstein; B Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1991-11
View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Radiographic predictors of femoroacetabular impingement treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan M Degen; Danyal H Nawabi; Asheesh Bedi; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Hip arthroscopy].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; I J Banke; J Schauwecker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Symposium: Advanced hip arthroscopy: editorial comment.

Authors:  Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.

Authors:  Miguel O Castro; Vasco V Mascarenhas; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Florian Schmaranzer; Reto Sutter; Ara Kassarjian; Luca Sconfienza; Michael Dienst; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Hip labral repair: options and outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

6.  T2*-Mapping of Acetabular Cartilage in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement at 3 Tesla: Comparative Analysis with Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Christina Neugroda; Christoph Schleich; Gerald Antoch; Harish Hosalkar; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Efficacy of intraarticular corticosteroid hip injections for osteoarthritis and subsequent surgery.

Authors:  Wilson C Lai; Armin Arshi; Dean Wang; Leanne L Seeger; Kambiz Motamedi; Benjamin D Levine; Sharon L Hame
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Preoperative risk factors in hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Roberto Seijas; David Barastegui; Carlos López-de-Celis; Ferran Montaña; Xavier Cuscó; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Gonzalo Samitier-Solis; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Psychologic distress reduces preoperative self-assessment scores in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Grant S Sun; James T Beckmann; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Magnetic resonance arthrography and the prevalence of acetabular labral tears in patients 50 years of age and older.

Authors:  Rohit Jayakar; Alexa Merz; Benjamin Plotkin; Dean Wang; Leanne Seeger; Sharon L Hame
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.