Literature DB >> 9790206

Prospective, randomized trial of Doppler-assisted subclavian vein catheterization.

R J Bold1, D J Winchester, A R Madary, M A Gregurich, P F Mansfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rate of success and complications of Doppler-guided subclavian vein catheter insertion compared with standard insertion in patients considered at high risk for failure.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Two hundred forty patients were enrolled in the study. Patients were stratified for 3 known risk factors: (1) prior surgery in the subclavian vein region, (2) prior radiotherapy at the attempted catheterization site, and (3) an abnormal weight-height ratio.
INTERVENTIONS: Subclavian vein catheterization was performed either in standard or Doppler-guided fashion using the Smart Needle (Peripheral Systems Group, Mountain View, Calif), which is a Doppler probe at the tip of a cannulating needle. If subclavian vein catheterization was unsuccessful after 2 attempts, patients were crossed over to the other technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Successful cannulation of the subclavian vein.
RESULTS: The success rate, either as an initial technique or as a salvage technique, and complication rate were not significantly different with use of the Smart Needle. A subgroup of physicians had a significantly lower success rate using the Smart Needle.
CONCLUSIONS: Doppler guidance did not increase the success rate or decrease the complication rate of subclavian vein catheterization when compared with the standard technique in high-risk patients. Doppler guidance was not more useful than the standard technique as a salvage technique following a previous failure of catheterization. Furthermore, real-time Doppler guidance of subclavian vein catheterization is a technique that is highly operator dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790206     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  17 in total

1.  Ultrasound guided central venous access.

Authors:  Manfred Muhm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

2.  Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation is superior to quick-look ultrasound and landmark methods among inexperienced operators: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Norair Airapetian; Julien Maizel; François Langelle; Santhi Samy Modeliar; Dimitrios Karakitsos; Herve Dupont; Michel Slama
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  A delayed diagnosis of a retained guidewire during central venous catheterisation: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yasemin Gunduz; Mehmet Bulent Vatan; Altug Osken; Mehmet Akif Cakar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-19

Review 4.  Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Adriana Toro; Simonetta Pozzi; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Accuracy of Anatomical Landmarks in Locating the Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Site among Different Levels of Anesthesia Trainees.

Authors:  Mohammad Helwani; Nahel Saied; Shigemasa Ikeda
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2008-07-01

6.  Accurate guidance of a catheter by ultrasound imaging and identification of a catheter tip by pulsed-wave Doppler.

Authors:  Eileen M McMahon; Panupong Jiamsripong; Minako Katayama; Hari P Chaliki; Mostafa Fatemi; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Acoustically active injection catheter guided by ultrasound: navigation tests in acutely ischemic porcine hearts.

Authors:  Marek Belohlavek; Minako Katayama; David Zarbatany; F David Fortuin; Mostafa Fatemi; Ivan Z Nenadic; Eileen M McMahon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Catheter-related Complications of Subcutaneous Implantable Venous Access Devices in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Balat; Iryna Schmeil; Thomas Karn; Uwe Holtrich; Loreta Mavrova-Risteska; Achim Rody; Aly Youssef; Lars C Hanker
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  A descriptive comparison of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation of the internal jugular vein to landmark-based subclavian vein cannulation.

Authors:  Daniel Theodoro; Brian Bausano; Lawrence Lewis; Bradley Evanoff; Marin Kollef
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  The use of tissue models for vascular access training. Phase I of the procedural patient safety initiative.

Authors:  Mark J Ault; Bradley T Rosen; Brian Ault
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.