Literature DB >> 9788077

ERP and fMRI measures of visual spatial selective attention.

G R Mangun1, M H Buonocore, M Girelli, A P Jha.   

Abstract

In two prior studies, we investigated the neural mechanisms of spatial attention using a combined event-related potential (ERP) and positron emission tomography (PET) approach (Heinze et al. [1994]: Nature 392:543-546; Mangun et al. [1997]: Hum Brain Mapp 5:273-279). Neural activations in extrastriate cortex were observed in the PET measures for attended stimuli, and these effects were related to attentional modulations in the ERPs at specific latencies. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and ERPs in single subjects to investigate the intersubject variability in extrastriate spatial attention effects, and to qualitatively compare this to variations in ERP attention effects. Activations in single subjects replicated our prior group-averaged PET findings, showing attention-related increases in blood flow in the posterior fusiform and middle occipital gyri in the hemisphere contralateral to attended visual stimuli. All subjects showed attentional modulations of the occipital P1 component of the ERPs. These findings in single subjects demonstrate the consistency of extrastriate attention effects, and provide information about the feasibility of this approach for integration of electrical and functional imaging data.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9788077      PMCID: PMC6873372     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  20 in total

1.  Auditory and visual attention assessed with PET.

Authors:  D S O'Leary; N C Andreasen; R R Hurtig; I J Torres; L A Flashman; M L Kesler; S V Arndt; T J Cizadlo; L L Ponto; G L Watkins; R D Hichwa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Retinotopic organization of early visual spatial attention effects as revealed by PET and ERPs.

Authors:  M G Woldorff; P T Fox; M Matzke; J L Lancaster; S Veeraswamy; F Zamarripa; M Seabolt; T Glass; J H Gao; C C Martin; P Jerabek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Attention-regulated activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  T Watanabe; Y Sasaki; S Miyauchi; B Putz; N Fujimaki; M Nielsen; R Takino; S Miyakawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction.

Authors:  M H Buonocore; L Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping.

Authors:  F Perrin; J Pernier; O Bertrand; J F Echallier
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-02

7.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M I Sereno; A M Dale; J B Reppas; K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  55 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic imaging of higher brain function.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith; L K McEvoy; H Leong; J Le
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatial summation revealed in the earliest visual evoked component C1 and the effect of attention on its linearity.

Authors:  Juan Chen; Qing Yu; Ziyun Zhu; Yujia Peng; Fang Fang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The role of prefrontal cortex in resolving distractor interference.

Authors:  Amishi P Jha; Sara A Fabian; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Temporal kinetics of prefrontal modulation of the extrastriate cortex during visual attention.

Authors:  Elena Yago; Audrey Duarte; Ting Wong; Francisco Barceló; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The Whorfian mind: Electrophysiological evidence that language shapes perception.

Authors:  Panos Athanasopoulos; Alison Wiggett; Benjamin Dering; Jan-Rouke Kuipers; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-07

7.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors.

Authors:  Stacia R Friedman-Hill; Lynn C Robertson; Robert Desimone; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Intermodal auditory, visual, and tactile attention modulates early stages of neural processing.

Authors:  Christina M Karns; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Encouraging expressions affect the brain and alter visual attention.

Authors:  Manuel Martín-Loeches; Alejandra Sel; Pilar Casado; Laura Jiménez; Luis Castellanos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.