Literature DB >> 978094

Part II: magnetic field produced by a current dipole.

D Cohen, H Hosaka.   

Abstract

To understand the MCG, electrical models of the heart must be used in which the basic building-block is usually the current dipole. The dipole's magnetic field is generally made up of two parts: 1. the contribution by the dipole element itself, which is mathematically simple; 2. the contribution by the current generated in the volume conductor by the dipole, which is complicated and depends on the boundaries; for special boundaries this contribution is zero to Bz, the component of magnetic field which is normal to the boundary. This applies to the boundaries of the semi-infinite volume conductor, the infinite slab, and the sphere. This property allows great simplification in solving the magnetic forward and inverse problems. Because of its importance, it is proven with electrolytic tank experiments. Based on this property, a method is presented for estimating the presence of those dipole combinations which produce a suppressed surface potential; it consists of a visual examination of an "arrow" display of Bz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 978094     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(76)80041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  21 in total

1.  Right ventricular volume unloading evaluated by tangential magnetocardiography.

Authors:  Y Terada; T Mitsui; M Sato; H Horigome; K Tsukada
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-01

2.  Orthogonal expansions: their applicability to signal extraction in electrophysiological mapping data.

Authors:  R Lamothe; G Stroink
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Biomagnetic functional localization of a peripheral nerve in man.

Authors:  L Trahms; S N Erné; Z Trontelj; G Curio; P Aust
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Magnetic evoked field associated with transcortical currents in turtle cerebellum.

Authors:  Y C Okada; C Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Invariance in current dipole moment density across brain structures and species: physiological constraint for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Shingo Murakami; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Characterization of gastric electrical activity using magnetic field measurements: a simulation study.

Authors:  J H K Kim; L A Bradshaw; A J Pullan; L K Cheng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Characterization of Electrophysiological Propagation by Multichannel Sensors.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Juliana H Kim; Suseela Somarajan; William O Richards; Leo K Cheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 8.  Empirical comparison of the MEG and EEG: animal models of the direct cortical response and epileptiform activity in neocortex.

Authors:  D S Barth
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Surface current density mapping for identification of gastric slow wave propagation.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Leo K Cheng; William O Richards; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  MEG Coherence and DTI Connectivity in mTLE.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Susan M Bowyer; John E Moran; Esmaeil Davoodi-Bojd; Andrew Zillgitt; Barbara J Weiland; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Fariborz Mahmoudi; Kost Elisevich; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.