Literature DB >> 3390518

Magnetic evoked field associated with transcortical currents in turtle cerebellum.

Y C Okada1, C Nicholson.   

Abstract

The neural basis of magnetic evoked fields of the brain was studied with an isolated turtle cerebellum as a model preparation. The turtle cerebellum is a nearly flat tissue with neural processes arranged along three orthogonal axes of symmetry. According to theoretical results, this geometry should enable us to selectively measure the magnetic field due to a subpopulation of nerve cells whose longitudinal axes are perpendicular to the cerebellar surface, by simply placing the cerebellum vertically in the bath so that these cells are horizontal and by measuring the field along the rostrocaudal axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of these nerve cells. To elicit neural activity in these cells the dorsal midline was electrically stimulated with a bipolar electrode. Consistent with our expectations, the one-dimensional profile of the field normal to bath surface (Bz) was antisymmetrical along the rostrocaudal axis, implying that the underlying currents were transcortical. Also, the Bz field at a field extremum varied as a cosine of the orientation of the cerebellum when it was rotated about its rostrocaudal axis with the amplitude being zero when the cerebellum was horizontal. The Bz field was dipolar as judged by statistically excellent fits of the dipolar field to the one-dimensional field profile and to the distance function relating the field magnitude at an extremum to measuring distance. This was the case even for the initial component thought to be due to antidromic action currents invading the soma and dendrites of Purkinje cells. We also showed that the dipolar term of the source could be localized within 1 mm of the actual source location in most cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3390518      PMCID: PMC1330250          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83153-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  19 in total

1.  Magnetic field associated with neural activities in an isolated cerebellum.

Authors:  Y C Okada; M Lauritzen; C Nicholson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Functional characterization of neuronal circuitry of frog cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  R Llinas; J R Bloedel; D E Hillman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Analysis of difference between potentials evoked by climbing fibers in cerebellum of cat and turtle.

Authors:  H Bantli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Model studies of the magnetocardiogram.

Authors:  F Grynszpan; D B Geselowitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Theoretical analysis of field potentials in anisotropic ensembles of neuronal elements.

Authors:  C Nicholson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Capability and limitations of electrocardiography and magnetocardiography.

Authors:  R Plonsey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.

Authors:  B N Cuffin; D Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-08

8.  Interaction experiments on the responses evoked in Purkinje cells by climbing fibres.

Authors:  J C Eccles; R Llinás; K Sasaki; P E Voorhoeve
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Intracellularly recorded responses of the cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  J C Eccles; R Llinás; K Sasaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The action of antidromic impulses on the cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  J C Eccles; R Llinás; K Sasaki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue.

Authors:  J C Huang; C Nicholson; Y C Okada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Anticipatory cerebellar responses during somatosensory omission in man.

Authors:  C D Tesche; J J Karhu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Invariance in current dipole moment density across brain structures and species: physiological constraint for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Shingo Murakami; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Empirical bases for constraints in current-imaging algorithms.

Authors:  Y Okada
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Direct neural current imaging in an intact cerebellum with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Padmavathi Sundaram; Aapo Nummenmaa; William Wells; Darren Orbach; Daniel Orringer; Robert Mulkern; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.

Authors:  Johanna M Zumer; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Leah A Krubitzer; Zhao Zhu; Robert S Turner; Elizabeth A Disbrow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  Oscillations and the basal ganglia: motor control and beyond.

Authors:  John-Stuart Brittain; Peter Brown
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Empirical comparison of the MEG and EEG: animal models of the direct cortical response and epileptiform activity in neocortex.

Authors:  D S Barth
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Discordant Alpha-Band Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Affects Cortico-Cortical and Cortico-Cerebellar Connectivity.

Authors:  Claudia D Tesche; Jon M Houck
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2020-05-06

10.  The relationship between magnetic and electrophysiological responses to complex tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Zhao Zhu; Johanna M Zumer; Marianne E Lowenthal; Jeff Padberg; Gregg H Recanzone; Leah A Krubitzer; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Elizabeth A Disbrow
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.288

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.