OBJECTIVE: The propagation of electrophysiological activity measured by multichannel devices could have significant clinical implications. Gastric slow waves normally propagate along longitudinal paths that are evident in recordings of serosal potentials and transcutaneous magnetic fields. We employed a realistic model of gastric slow wave activity to simulate the transabdominal magnetogastrogram (MGG) recorded in a multichannel biomagnetometer and to determine characteristics of electrophysiological propagation from MGG measurements. METHODS: Using MGG simulations of slow wave sources in a realistic abdomen (both superficial and deep sources) and in a horizontally-layered volume conductor, we compared two analytic methods (second-order blind identification, SOBI and surface current density, SCD) that allow quantitative characterization of slow wave propagation. We also evaluated the performance of the methods with simulated experimental noise. The methods were also validated in an experimental animal model. RESULTS: Mean square errors in position estimates were within 2 cm of the correct position, and average propagation velocities within 2 mm/s of the actual velocities. SOBI propagation analysis outperformed the SCD method for dipoles in the superficial and horizontal layer models with and without additive noise. The SCD method gave better estimates for deep sources, but did not handle additive noise as well as SOBI. CONCLUSION: SOBI-MGG and SCD-MGG were used to quantify slow wave propagation in a realistic abdomen model of gastric electrical activity. SIGNIFICANCE: These methods could be generalized to any propagating electrophysiological activity detected by multichannel sensor arrays.
OBJECTIVE: The propagation of electrophysiological activity measured by multichannel devices could have significant clinical implications. Gastric slow waves normally propagate along longitudinal paths that are evident in recordings of serosal potentials and transcutaneous magnetic fields. We employed a realistic model of gastric slow wave activity to simulate the transabdominal magnetogastrogram (MGG) recorded in a multichannel biomagnetometer and to determine characteristics of electrophysiological propagation from MGG measurements. METHODS: Using MGG simulations of slow wave sources in a realistic abdomen (both superficial and deep sources) and in a horizontally-layered volume conductor, we compared two analytic methods (second-order blind identification, SOBI and surface current density, SCD) that allow quantitative characterization of slow wave propagation. We also evaluated the performance of the methods with simulated experimental noise. The methods were also validated in an experimental animal model. RESULTS: Mean square errors in position estimates were within 2 cm of the correct position, and average propagation velocities within 2 mm/s of the actual velocities. SOBI propagation analysis outperformed the SCD method for dipoles in the superficial and horizontal layer models with and without additive noise. The SCD method gave better estimates for deep sources, but did not handle additive noise as well as SOBI. CONCLUSION: SOBI-MGG and SCD-MGG were used to quantify slow wave propagation in a realistic abdomen model of gastric electrical activity. SIGNIFICANCE: These methods could be generalized to any propagating electrophysiological activity detected by multichannel sensor arrays.
Authors: Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Gregory O'Grady; Peng Du; Andrew J Pullan; Leo K Cheng Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-12-26 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Jurriaan M Peters; Anna K Prohl; Shigetoshi Takaya; Joseph R Madsen; Blaise F Bourgeois; Barbara A Dworetzky; Matti S Hämäläinen; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Suseela Somarajan; Nicole D Muszynski; Dilovan Hawrami; Joseph D Olson; Leo K Cheng; Leonard A Bradshaw Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Daniel A Carson; Sameer Bhat; Tommy C L Hayes; Armen A Gharibans; Christopher N Andrews; Gregory O'Grady; Chris Varghese Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Chad E Eichler; Leo K Cheng; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Peng Du; Leonard A Bradshaw; Recep Avci Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Peng Du; Stefan Calder; Timothy R Angeli; Shameer Sathar; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Gregory O'Grady; Leo K Cheng Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.566