Literature DB >> 9758398

The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch.

D Tortopidis1, M F Lyons, R H Baxendale, W H Gilmour.   

Abstract

The effect of measuring bite force with different patterns of transducer on different occasions was studied. Maximum voluntary bite force was measured in eight volunteers. Three transducer positions, each with a different pattern of transducer, were used; between the anterior teeth, between the second premolar and the first molar on one side and between the second premolars and first molars on both sides. Visual feedback of force was provided. Two sets of five maximum clenches were recorded with a rest period in between. This sequence was repeated for each transducer and the experiment was repeated on three different days. The highest forces were measured with the bilateral posterior transducer (mean 580 N, s.d. 235) and the lowest on the anterior transducer (mean 286 N, s.d. 164). The standard deviations of the bite force mean values were used as an indication of the variability and were subjected to a non-parametric anova (Kruskal-Wallis). The forces recorded with each transducer position were significantly different between the transducers (P < 0.01) and the maximum bite force showed least variability when measured between the posterior teeth on one side only. There was little difference in bite force between the three different sessions (P > or = 0.05) when measured in the same position within the dental arch, whichever of the three positions that may be.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9758398     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00293.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  34 in total

1.  Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology.

Authors:  Moritz Zimmermann; Andreas Ender; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Low-Profile Electromagnetic Field Sensors in the Measurement and Modelling of Three-Dimensional Jaw Kinematics and Occlusal Loading.

Authors:  Sarah C Woodford; Dale L Robinson; Cornelia Edelmann; Albert Mehl; Oliver Röhrle; Peter Vee Sin Lee; David C Ackland
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A simple safe, reliable and reproducible mechanism for producing experimental bite marks.

Authors:  S Subramanyeswara Chinni; Anas Al-Ibrahim; Andrew H Forgie
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2013-12-01

4.  Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Ilknur Veli; Tancan Uysal; Asli Baysal; Irfan Karadede
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 5.  Bite Force Recording Devices - A Review.

Authors:  Tarun Prakash Verma; Kanteshwari Iranagouda Kumathalli; Vinay Jain; Rajesh Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Changes in occlusal bite force following placement of preformed metal crowns on primary molars in 4-6 years old children: a 6 months' follow-up pilot study.

Authors:  A I Owais; A H Al-Battah; E S Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-11-20

7.  Vertical fracture of root filled teeth restored with posts: the effects of patient age and dentine thickness.

Authors:  A S Mireku; E Romberg; A F Fouad; D Arola
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Reliability and fatigue failure modes of implant-supported aluminum-oxide fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Christian F J Stappert; Marta Baldassarri; Yu Zhang; Felix Hänssler; Elizabeth D Rekow
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Effects of simulated functional loading conditions on dentin, composite, and laminate structures.

Authors:  Mary P Walker; Heather K Teitelbaum; J David Eick; Karen B Williams
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review.

Authors:  Duygu Koc; Arife Dogan; Bulent Bek
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.