Literature DB >> 31286262

Fracture load of three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses fabricated with subtractive and additive CAD/CAM technology.

Moritz Zimmermann1, Andreas Ender2, Thomas Attin3, Albert Mehl2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the fracture load of ceramic and composite three-unit full-contour fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated with additive and subtractive computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) technology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A newly developed alveolar socket replica model for a three-unit FDP replacing one molar was used in this study. Five CAD/CAM materials were used for fabrication of three-unit FDPs (each n = 12). The subtractive CAD/CAM fabrication method was used for groups BC (BRILLIANT Crios), TC (Telio CAD), EX (e.max CAD), and TZ (inCoris TZI C), and the additive method was used for group 3D (els 3D resin even stronger). FDPs were adhesively seated to the abutment dies (PANAVIA V5 system). Thermomechanical loading was performed prior to fracture testing with a universal testing machine. The data for maximum fracture load values was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post hoc Scheffé test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: All FDPs survived the thermomechanical loading test. Statistically significant differences were found for the fracture load of three-unit FDPs fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials (p < 0.05). The highest mean fracture load was found for group TZ (2099.5 ± 382.1 N). Group 3D showed the lowest mean fracture load (928.9 ± 193.8 N). Group BC performed statistically significantly differently from group 3D with a mean fracture load of 1494.8 ± 214.5 N (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM materials showed fracture load values within the range of ceramic materials with a specific indication of use for three-unit FDPs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Particle filled composite CAD/CAM materials may offer new treatment possibilities for the CAD/CAM workflow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; CEREC; Ceramic; Composite; Three-unit FDP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31286262     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03000-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  45 in total

1.  A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results.

Authors:  Jesus Peláez; Pablo G Cogolludo; Benjamin Serrano; Jose F L Lozano; Maria J Suárez
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study.

Authors:  Erkan Erkmen; Gökçe Meriç; Ahmet Kurt; Yahya Tunç; Atılım Eser
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-10-01

3.  Use of abutment-teeth vs. dental implants to support all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in-vitro study on fracture strength.

Authors:  Per Vult von Steyern; Yuji Kokubo; Krister Nilner
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2005

4.  Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Kwansiri Plengsombut; Jane D Brewer; Edward A Monaco; Elaine L Davis
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  New CAD/CAM materials and blocks for chairside procedures.

Authors:  M Zimmermann; A Mehl; S Reich
Journal:  Int J Comput Dent       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.883

6.  Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results.

Authors:  Stefan Wolfart; Stefanie Eschbach; Susanne Scherrer; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Clinical outcomes of different types of tooth-supported bilayer lithium disilicate all-ceramic restorations after functioning up to 5 years: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yanwei Yang; Jintao Yu; Jing Gao; Jiawen Guo; Ling Li; Yun Zhao; Shaofeng Zhang
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic.

Authors:  S S Scherrer; W G de Rijk; U C Belser; J M Meyer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Influence of abutment model materials on the fracture loads of three-unit fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Timea Wimmer; Kurt-Jürgen Erdelt; Marlis Eichberger; Malgorzata Roos; Daniel Edelhoff; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Won Choi; So-Yeun Kim; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Eun-Bin Bae; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

View more
  2 in total

1.  Load-to-Failure Resistance and Optical Characteristics of Nano-Lithium Disilicate Ceramic after Different Aging Processes.

Authors:  Mustafa Borga Donmez; Emin Orkun Olcay; Münir Demirel
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Influence of CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Fabrication Methods on the Mechanical Properties of 3-Unit Interim Fixed Dental Prosthesis after Thermo-Mechanical Aging Process.

Authors:  Passent Ellakany; Shaimaa M Fouda; Amr A Mahrous; Maram A AlGhamdi; Nourhan M Aly
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.