Literature DB >> 22093019

Reliability and fatigue failure modes of implant-supported aluminum-oxide fixed dental prostheses.

Christian F J Stappert1, Marta Baldassarri, Yu Zhang, Felix Hänssler, Elizabeth D Rekow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate failure modes and reliability of implant-supported aluminum-oxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) using two different veneering porcelains.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six aluminum-oxide FDP frameworks were computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured and either hand-veneered(n = 18) or over-pressed(n = 18). All FDPs were adhesively luted to custom-made zirconium-oxide-abutments attached to dental implant fixtures (regular platform 4 × 13 mm). Specimens were stored in water before mechanical testing. A step-stress accelerated life test (SSALT) with three load/cycles varying profiles was developed based on initial single-load-to-failure testing. Failure was defined by veneer chipping or chipping in combination with framework fracture. SSALT was performed on each FDP inclined 30° with respect to the applied load direction. For all specimens, failure modes were analyzed using polarized reflected light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Reliability was computed using Weibull analysis software (Reliasoft).
RESULTS: The dominant failure mode for the over-pressed FDPs was buccal chipping of the porcelain in the loading area of the pontic, while hand-veneered specimens failed mainly by combined failure modes in the veneering porcelain, framework, and abutments. Chipping of the porcelain occurred earlier in the over-pressed specimens (350 N/85 k, load/cycles) than in the hand-veneered ones (600 N/110 k) (profile I). Given a mission at 300 N load and 100 or 200 k cycles, the computed Weibull reliability (two-sided at 90% confidence bounds) was 0.99(1/0.98) and 0.99(1/0.98) for hand-veneered FDPs and 0.45(0.76/0.10) and 0.05(0.63/0) for over-pressed FDPs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In the range of average clinical loads (300-700 N), hand-veneered aluminum-oxide FDPs showed significantly less failure by chipping of the veneer than the over-pressed. Hand-veneered FDPs under fatigue loading failed at loads ≥600 N.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22093019      PMCID: PMC3486729          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  36 in total

1.  Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs.

Authors:  P Vult von Steyern; O Jönsson; K Nilner
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Anterior esthetic rehabilitation on teeth and dental implants optimized with Procera technology: a case report.

Authors:  P Bonnard; M Hermans; P Adriaenssens; P Daelemans; C Malevez
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.843

3.  Materials design of ceramic-based layer structures for crowns.

Authors:  B R Lawn; Y Deng; I K Lloyd; M N Janal; E D Rekow; V P Thompson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Evaluation of custom-made procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kristina Henriksson; Torsten Jemt
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  Materials for all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Ariel J Raigrodski
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.843

6.  High-alumina ceramics for bridge pontic construction.

Authors:  J W McLean
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1967-12-19       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  D R Haselton; A M Diaz-Arnold; S L Hillis
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs.

Authors:  Karl-Gustaf Olsson; Björn Fürst; Bernt Andersson; Gunnar E Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Murat Yildirim; Horst Fischer; Rudolf Marx; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study.

Authors:  B Andersson; A Taylor; B R Lang; H Scheller; P Schärer; J A Sorensen; D Tarnow
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  2 in total

1.  THERMAL RESIDUAL STRESSES IN BILAYERED, TRILAYERED AND GRADED DENTAL CERAMICS.

Authors:  Douglas Fabris; Júlio C M Souza; Filipe S Silva; Márcio Fredel; Joana Mesquita-Guimarães; Yu Zhang; Bruno Henriques
Journal:  Ceram Int       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.527

Review 2.  Fatigue of dental ceramics.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Irena Sailer; Brian R Lawn
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.