Literature DB >> 25344123

Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.

Ilknur Veli1, Tancan Uysal, Asli Baysal, Irfan Karadede.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cortical bone thickness plays an important role in the primary stability of miniscrews. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the buccal cortical bone thickness in adolescent subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the CBCT images of 75 patients (30 males, 45 females; mean age 16.5 years; range 15.3-17.7 years) in the present study. High-, average- and low-angle subgroups were generated according to SN-GoMe angle. On volumetric images, we measured the buccal cortical bone thickness from canine to the second molar teeth at heights of 5, 7 and 9 mm from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). For statistical evaluation, the Wilcoxon signed rank, Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey HSD tests were applied at the p < 0.05 level.
RESULTS: Buccal cortical bone was thickest in the low-angle group. We observed statistically significant differences in the maxilla between the high- and low-angle groups at all levels. In the mandible, we noted statistically significant differences between high-angle and low-angle groups in the canine-first premolar regions at heights of 5 and 7 mm, and in the second premolar-first molar region at 7 mm height from CEJ. Significant differences were also present between the first and second premolars at heights of 7 and 9 mm. Average cortical bone thickness ranged from 1.10-1.37 mm in the maxilla and 1.20-3.28 mm in the mandible for all groups.
CONCLUSION: Buccal cortical bone thickness in adolescents varied in different vertical skeletal patterns and was greater in the mandible than in the maxilla, with the distance increasing from the CEJ to the apex. As the buccal cortical bone is thinner in high-angle patients, patient-specific measures should be taken when performing miniscrew treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25344123     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-014-0235-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  39 in total

1.  Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible.

Authors:  T Masumoto; I Hayashi; A Kawamura; K Tanaka; K Kasai
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  M G Cavalcanti; J Yang; A Ruprecht; M W Vannier
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Nonextraction treatment with microscrew implants.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Tae-Geon Kwon; Jae-Hyun Sung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Kim; Hee-Sun Yun; Hyun-Do Park; Doo-Hyung Kim; Young-Chel Park
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Benedict Wilmes; Carsten Rademacher; Gudrun Olthoff; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Mitsuru Motoyoshi; Tohru Yoshida; Akiko Ono; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.

Authors:  David Farnsworth; P Emile Rossouw; Richard F Ceen; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement.

Authors:  I Turkyilmaz; T F Tözüm; C Tumer; E N Ozbek
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report.

Authors:  A Costa; M Raffainl; B Melsen
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1998

10.  Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults.

Authors:  Keri A Horner; Rolf G Behrents; Ki Beom Kim; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analysis of biological and structural factors implicated in the clinical success of orthodontic miniscrews at posterior maxillary interradicular sites.

Authors:  M Palone; A Darsiè; G B Maino; G Siciliani; G A Spedicato; L Lombardo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mechanical and histological evaluation of a titanium device for orthodontic anchorage, placed with or without cyanoacrylate adhesive.

Authors:  Anderson Antonio Mamede; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-08-01

3.  Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT.

Authors:  Haibo Liu; Xiaoxue Wu; Jun Tan; Xiao Li
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Mandibular skeletal posterior anatomic limit for molar distalization in patients with Class III malocclusion with different vertical facial patterns.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Kim; Kyung-Suk Cha; Jin-Woo Lee; Sang-Min Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.