Literature DB >> 975699

ICP monitoring: complications and associated factors.

M J Rosner, D P Becker.   

Abstract

1. Patients with complications when compared with those not developing a complication: a. Were older, 44.4 vs. 34.5 years; b. Were monitored longer, 14.0 vs. 6.5 days; c. Were treated with steroids longer, 18.3 vs. 10.3 days; d. Were hospitalized longer, 35.7 vs. 27.7 days; e. Are twice as likely to die; f. Average age of those dying is older, 46 vs. 30 years; g. Have no clear relationship to antibiotics; h. Do not have a preponderance of single diagnostic category to account for these differences; i. Complications were always controlled with standard therapy; j. An ICP complication was almost never responsible, per se, for death. 2. Over all complication rate was 18%; due to monitoring was 4.5 to 11.5%. 3. Monitoring was responsible for, or contributed to, 25 to 60% of the complications. 4. No complications occurred when monitoring was discontinued within 3 days. 5. Long periods of treatment with steroids increased the risk of a complication developing. 6. Long periods of monitoring were associated with an increased risk of complication. 7. "Individual" factors are partly responsible for the development of a complication, and death. 8. There are two groups of complications: "early" and "late." A. Those most likely to be monitor related occur "late" and account for 35% of the complications. B. Those developing "early" infection account for 65% of the complications and are most likely caused by factors other than monitoring. While there are complications directly attributable to monitoring, the rate is low and they are readily controlled by standard neurosurgical management. While monitoring may increase the morbidity, it does not increase the mortality. We feel that the over-all risk is small and that the returns are great--both in terms of knowledge and patient benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 975699     DOI: 10.1093/neurosurgery/23.cn_suppl_1.494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurosurg        ISSN: 0069-4827


  15 in total

1.  Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.

Authors:  A Bekar; S Gören; E Korfali; K Aksoy; S Boyaci
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Bedside burr hole for intracranial pressure monitoring performed by intensive care physicians. A 5-year experience.

Authors:  M Bochicchio; N Latronico; S Zappa; A Beindorf; A Candiani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Clinical evaluation of a simple epidural pressure sensor.

Authors:  M Kosteljanetz; S E Børgesen; P Stjernholm; L Christensen; O Osgaard; F Gjerris; J Rosenørn
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Monitoring and treatment of raised intracranial pressure in children.

Authors:  R Dinwiddie; J Stroobant
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis and cerebral spinal fluid infection in patients with intracranial pressure monitors.

Authors:  John J Flibotte; Kim En Lee; Walter J Koroshetz; Jonathan Rosand; Colin T McDonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Relative risks of ventriculostomy infection and morbidity.

Authors:  C G Paramore; D A Turner
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Epidural pressure monitoring with the so-called Rotterdam transducer. Further in vivo results.

Authors:  D A de Jong; M W Berfelo; S A de Lange; A I Maas
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Some principles of postoperative epidural pressure monitoring.

Authors:  M Belopavlovic; A Buchthal; J W Beks; H L Journée
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Ventriculo-lumbar perfusion in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Rodney D Bell; Barbara L Powers; David Brock; J Javier Provencio; Adam Flanders; Ronald Benetiz; Robert Rosenwasser; Jamie Strause; Glenn Frazer; Michael S Kramer; David Hesson; James Barnitz; J L Osterholm
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Clinical experience with a fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor.

Authors:  J S Yablon; H J Lantner; T M McCormack; S Nair; E Barker; P Black
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.