Literature DB >> 10068186

Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device.

A Bekar1, S Gören, E Korfali, K Aksoy, S Boyaci.   

Abstract

Seventy-five patients with intracranial hypertension whose Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was 8 or below and in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored were examined for complications of this procedure. In 20 of the 75 patients we used only an intraparenchymal fiberoptic ICP monitoring transducer, while, in the remaining 55 patients, who required CSF drainage, a ventricular drainage set (VDS) was used in addition to ICP monitoring. The duration of monitoring with the ICP transducer alone was approximately 5.1+/-2.6 das (min. 1, max. 13) and that of ICP monitoring with VDS was 6.2+/-3.1 days (min. 1, max. 13). In 8 cases a total of 9 complications were experienced (12%). These complications were infection in 3 cases (4%), epidural hematoma in 2 cases (2.7%), disconnection in 2 cases (2.7%) and contusion in 2 cases (2.7%). Although none of the 44 patients who were monitored for less than 5 days experienced infection, 3 of the 31 patients monitored for longer than 5 days did experience infection (9.7%) (p<0.05). None of the 20 patients who underwent ICP monitoring only experienced infection. However, 3 of the 55 patients in whom the ventricular drainage set was implanted in addition to the transducer for ICP monitoring experienced infection (p<0.05). Owing to its minimally invasive nature, low complication rate, and accuracy in monitoring the parenchyma pressure, the Camino fiberoptic intraparenchymal monitor has become the system of choice in our clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10068186     DOI: 10.1007/bf01105781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  32 in total

1.  Intracranial pressure monitoring: fiberoptic monitor compared with the ventricular catheter.

Authors:  D J Schickner; R F Young
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1992-04

2.  Infections complicating the use of external ventriculostomy.

Authors:  R W Smith; J F Alksne
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Evaluation of a fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor.

Authors:  J S Crutchfield; R K Narayan; C S Robertson; L H Michael
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management.

Authors:  D P Becker; J D Miller; J D Ward; R P Greenberg; H F Young; R Sakalas
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Comparison among three methods of intracranial pressure recording.

Authors:  B North; P Reilly
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  L F Marshall; R W Smith; H M Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 7.  Management of elevated intracranial pressure.

Authors:  P S Woster; K L LeBlanc
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1990-10

8.  ICP monitoring: complications and associated factors.

Authors:  M J Rosner; D P Becker
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1976

9.  Intracranial pressure monitoring after elective intracranial surgery. A retrospective study of 514 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S Constantini; S Cotev; Z H Rappaport; S Pomeranz; M N Shalit
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Duration of intracranial pressure monitoring does not predict daily risk of infectious complications.

Authors:  J A Winfield; P Rosenthal; R K Kanter; G Casella
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Neuromonitoring in the intensive care unit. I. Intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow monitoring.

Authors:  Anuj Bhatia; Arun Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Management of increased intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Danielle K Sandsmark; Kevin N Sheth
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.598

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.