Literature DB >> 8345369

Clinical experience with a fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor.

J S Yablon1, H J Lantner, T M McCormack, S Nair, E Barker, P Black.   

Abstract

Retrospective clinical experience with our first 46 patients monitored with a fiberoptic intracranial pressure device is described. In 43 of 46 patients, the transducer was introduced into brain parenchyma. A ventriculostomy system was used in 3 of 46 patients. The monitoring system was generally characterized by ease of placement and system maintenance and by technical simplicity. Several problems were encountered, including breakage of system components (12%), erroneous readings requiring transducer repositioning (8.6%), epidural hematoma (3.4%), and infection (1.7%). No infections or hematomas occurred in the 3 cases in which the ventriculostomy system was used. Overall, our experience with the Camino intracranial pressure fiberoptic monitoring system confirms previous reports of its favorable features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8345369     DOI: 10.1007/bf01617024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  27 in total

1.  [MEASUREMENT OF INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE IN CHILDREN WITHOUT PUNCTURE (NEW METHOD)].

Authors:  V R PURIN
Journal:  Pediatriia       Date:  1964-05

2.  A DEVICE FOR MEASURING INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE.

Authors:  R HOPPENSTEIN
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  [Continuous intracranial manometry; importance of the method and first results].

Authors:  J GUILLAUME; P JANNY
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1951-02       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  Evaluation of a fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor.

Authors:  J S Crutchfield; R K Narayan; C S Robertson; L H Michael
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Use of antibiotics with external ventriculostomies.

Authors:  A R Wyler; W A Kelly
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  L F Marshall; R W Smith; H M Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury.

Authors:  T G Saul; T B Ducker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury.

Authors:  R K Narayan; P R Kishore; D P Becker; J D Ward; G G Enas; R P Greenberg; A Domingues Da Silva; M H Lipper; S C Choi; C G Mayhall; H A Lutz; H F Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  ICP monitoring: complications and associated factors.

Authors:  M J Rosner; D P Becker
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1976

10.  Infectious complications and duration of intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  R K Kanter; L B Weiner; A M Patti; L K Robson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bedside burr hole for intracranial pressure monitoring performed by intensive care physicians. A 5-year experience.

Authors:  M Bochicchio; N Latronico; S Zappa; A Beindorf; A Candiani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Waydhas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999-09-24       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.