Literature DB >> 23972090

Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

H Neville1, J L Nicol, A Barss, K I Forster, M F Garrett.   

Abstract

Theoretical considerations and diverse empirical data from clinical, psycholinguistic, and developmental studies suggest that language comprehension processes are decomposable into separate subsystems, including distinct systems for semantic and grammatical processing. Here we report that event-related potentials (ERPs) to syntactically well-formed but semantically anomalous sentences produced a pattern of brain activity that is distinct in timing and distribution from the patterns elicited by syntactically deviant sentences, and further, that different types of syntactic deviance produced distinct ERP patterns. Forty right-handed young adults read sentences presented at 2 words/sec while ERPs were recorded from over several positions between and within the hemispheres. Half of the sentences were semantically and grammatically acceptable and were controls for the remainder, which contained sentence medial words that violated (1) semantic expectations, (2) phrase structure rules, or (3) WH-movement constraints on Specificity and (4) Subjacency. As in prior research, the semantic anomalies produced a negative potential, N400, that was bilaterally distributed and was largest over posterior regions. The phrase structure violations enhanced the N125 response over anterior regions of the left hemisphere, and elicited a negative response (300-500 msec) over temporal and parietal regions of the left hemisphere. Violations of Specificity constraints produced a slow negative potential, evident by 125 msec, that was also largest over anterior regions of the left hemisphere. Violations of Subjacency constraints elicited a broadly and symmetrically distributed positivity that onset around 200 msec. The distinct timing and distribution of these effects provide biological support for theories that distinguish between these types of grammatical rules and constraints and more generally for the proposal that semantic and grammatical processes are distinct subsystems within the language faculty.

Year:  1991        PMID: 23972090     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  127 in total

Review 1.  The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar.

Authors:  M T Ullman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-01

2.  A syntactic specialization for Broca's area.

Authors:  D Embick; A Marantz; Y Miyashita; W O'Neil; K L Sakai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: insights from ERPs and fMRI.

Authors:  C J Fiebach; M Schlesewsky; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

4.  An event-related fMRI study of syntactic and semantic violations.

Authors:  A J Newman; R Pancheva; K Ozawa; H J Neville; M T Ullman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

5.  Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Anja Hahne; Douglas Saddy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

6.  Readers' eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content.

Authors:  David Braze; Donald Shankweiler; Weijia Ni; Laura Conway Palumbo
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

7.  Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies: an ERP study.

Authors:  Edith Kaan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-03

8.  Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  A D Friederici; Y Wang; C S Herrmann; B Maess; U Oertel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information.

Authors:  A D Friederici; K Steinhauer; S Frisch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

10.  Identifying the null subject: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  J Demestre; S Meltzer; J E García-Albea; A Vigil
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1999-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.