Literature DB >> 17352621

Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.

Julie A Van Dyke1.   

Abstract

Evidence from 3 experiments reveals interference effects from structural relationships that are inconsistent with any grammatical parse of the perceived input. Processing disruption was observed when items occurring between a head and a dependent overlapped with either (or both) syntactic or semantic features of the dependent. Effects of syntactic interference occur in the earliest online measures in the region where the retrieval of a long-distance dependent occurs. Semantic interference effects occur in later online measures at the end of the sentence. Both effects endure in offline comprehension measures, suggesting that interfering items participate in incorrect interpretations that resist reanalysis. The data are discussed in terms of a cue-based retrieval account of parsing, which reconciles the fact that the parser must violate the grammar in order for these interference effects to occur. Broader implications of this research indicate a need for a precise specification of the interface between the parsing mechanism and the memory system that supports language comprehension.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17352621      PMCID: PMC2077343          DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  28 in total

1.  Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures.

Authors:  B McElree
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

Authors:  B McElree; M J Traxler; M J Pickering; R E Seely; R Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-01

3.  Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model.

Authors:  James S Nairne
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-08

5.  Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects.

Authors:  Whitney Tabor; Sean Hutchins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Brian McElree
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences.

Authors:  Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

10.  Anomaly detection: eye movement patterns.

Authors:  W Ni; J D Fodor; S Crain; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1998-09
View more
  62 in total

1.  Cognitive Constraints and Island Effects.

Authors:  Philip Hofmeister; Ivan A Sag
Journal:  Language (Baltim)       Date:  2010-06

2.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2012-03-12

3.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: a cross-linguistic investigation.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Brian McElree
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns; Anuenue Kukona
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-03-19

6.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input.

Authors:  Roger Levy; Klinton Bicknell; Tim Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cues, quantification, and agreement in language comprehension.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Nyssa Z Bulkes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

9.  Pushed aside: Parentheticals, Memory and Processing.

Authors:  Brian Dillon; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments.

Authors:  Philip Hofmeister; T Florian Jaeger; Inbal Arnon; Ivan A Sag; Neal Snider
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.